TITOW Kenneth · BURGESS
vs par split: bidding -0.37 · play -0.54
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.24/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.45/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% #74 of 207 · declarer play 66.7% #150 of 206 · defence 76.2% #176 of 208
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 33.3% (3) | 100.0% (7) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 57.1% (7) |
| Defence | 57.1% (7) | 85.7% (14) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (4) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 50.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +1.78 (9) · a suit -1.85 (26)
vs par by level: part-score -0.25 (12) · game -0.05 (21) · slam -14.00 (2)
By role: declaring -2.73/bd (-4.43 vs par · 14) · defending -0.99/bd (+1.43 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.36/bd (-1.50 vs par · 18) · not vulnerable -0.98/bd (-0.29 vs par · 17)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | J.Titow | X.Shi – C.Hu | Closed | 7 | -14.4 | -2.06 | +0.57 |
| Round 4 | J.Titow | C.Cheek – L.Deas | Closed | 7 | -13.4 | -1.91 | +0.14 |
| Round 5 | J.Titow | B.Shi – W.Tian | Closed | 7 | -22.0 | -3.14 | -5.71 |
| Round 7 | J.Titow | J.Cayne – G.Olivieri | Closed | 7 | -3.0 | -0.43 | -0.29 |
| Round 8 | J.Titow | Z.Zu – Y.Hu | Closed | 7 | -6.3 | -0.90 | +0.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.6 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 17 | 3NT | ♦Q | -1 | +11 |
| +4.6 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 19 | 4♠ | ♦9 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.5 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 16 | 2NT | ♠Q | -2 | +11 |
| +2.4 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 27 | 4♠ | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 27 | 4♣ | ♣J | -3 | +6 |
| +2.2 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 15 | 2NT | ♥10 | +1 | +6 |
| +2.0 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 25 | 4♥ | ♠K | -1 | +6 |
| +2.0 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 4 | 4♠ | ♥7 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.5 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 21 | 5♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 23 | 3NT | ♠9 | = | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 28 | 2♥ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 5 | 1NT | ♣4 | -1 | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 22 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 2 | 2♣ | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 23 | 3NT | ♥8 | +2 | -2 |
| -0.7 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 20 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -1.3 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 24 | 2♥ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 26 | 4♥xx | ♦10 | -1 | +6 |
| -1.7 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 15 | 3♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 19 | 3NT | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 20 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 3 | 3♥ | ♠4 | -1 | -3 |
| -2.5 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 16 | 2♠ | ♠J | +2 | -6 |
| -3.3 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 26 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | +5 |
| -4.0 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 25 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | +0 |
| -4.3 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 28 | 1♥ | ♠4 | +1 | -5 |
| -4.3 | Round 8 | WUHAN | 24 | 4♥ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| -4.7 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 21 | 5♥ | ♥A | -1 | -5 |
| -6.2 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 1 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -1 | -10 |
| -6.7 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 17 | 5♦x | ♠3 | -3 | -9 |
| -7.4 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 6 | 5♥ | ♦K | -2 | -11 |
| -7.5 | Round 3 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 18 | 3NT | ♣7 | = | +2 |
| -7.9 | Round 5 | NT FEIXIANG | 7 | 6♠ | ♣4 | -2 | -17 |
| -10.2 | Round 4 | LYNCH | 22 | 6♠ | ♦A | -1 | -11 |
| -10.2 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 18 | 1NT | ♠J | +1 | -13 |