WANG Yanhong · BEIJING TRINERGY
vs par split: bidding -0.83 · play -0.55
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.14/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.04/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.0% #79 of 398 · declarer play 70.6% #218 of 398 · defence 72.2% #381 of 399
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (7) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 69.2% (13) |
| Defence | 40.0% (5) | 84.6% (13) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 80.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.30 (10) · a suit -1.72 (32)
vs par by level: part-score +0.27 (15) · game -1.88 (25) · slam -7.50 (2)
By role: declaring -0.23/bd (-3.67 vs par · 24) · defending -0.13/bd (+1.67 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.42/bd (-0.82 vs par · 22) · not vulnerable -0.86/bd (-2.00 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | D.Lu | X.Shi – N.Wang | Open | 7 | -9.3 | -1.33 | -2.71 |
| Round 4 | X.Li | G.Zhou – X.Li | Open | 7 | +3.0 | +0.43 | -0.57 |
| Round 5 | X.Li | D.Bilde – C.Madsen | Open | 7 | +4.0 | +0.57 | +0.14 |
| Round 6 | D.Lu | C.Ganzer – S.Picus | Open | 7 | -3.9 | -0.56 | -2.86 |
| Round 7 | X.Li | A.Kowalski – E.Miszewska | Closed | 7 | -12.7 | -1.81 | -5.14 |
| Round 8 | X.Li | H.Eythorsdottir – E.Wold | Open | 7 | +11.0 | +1.57 | +2.86 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.5 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 24 | 4♥ | ♦J | -1 | +11 |
| +8.3 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 26 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | -1 |
| +7.4 | Round 6 | GANZER | 14 | 3NT | ♠Q | +1 | +4 |
| +5.9 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 1 | 2♥ | ♥6 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.7 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 23 | 5♣x | ♠K | -1 | +12 |
| +4.1 | Round 7 | VITAS | 19 | 2♠ | ♣K | +2 | +2 |
| +3.8 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 28 | 4♥ | ♣5 | -1 | +5 |
| +3.2 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 26 | 4♣ | ♠5 | -2 | +7 |
| +2.7 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 22 | 2♦x | ♥2 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.5 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 4 | 5♣ | ♣8 | = | -2 |
| +2.2 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 7 | 4♥ | ♥10 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 24 | 3NT | ♥3 | +2 | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 5 | 3NT | ♠9 | -2 | +5 |
| +2.1 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 25 | 5♠x | ♥4 | -2 | +0 |
| +1.9 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 7 | 2♥ | ♣3 | = | +6 |
| +1.8 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 28 | 3♥ | ♣2 | -1 | +3 |
| +0.8 | Round 7 | VITAS | 15 | 3♣ | ♠K | +1 | +1 |
| +0.6 | Round 6 | GANZER | 13 | 1NT | ♥K | +2 | +10 |
| +0.2 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 5 | 1NT | ♥3 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 25 | 3NT | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 6 | GANZER | 10 | 4♥ | ♥2 | = | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 2 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 6 | GANZER | 9 | 4♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 4 | 1NT | ♥A | = | -11 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 2 | 4♥ | ♣6 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.8 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 3 | 2♠ | ♣3 | +1 | -7 |
| -2.0 | Round 7 | VITAS | 17 | 3♥x | ♥3 | -2 | -12 |
| -2.5 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 27 | 5♣ | ♦K | -1 | -4 |
| -2.8 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 3 | 3NT | ♥3 | +1 | -4 |
| -3.0 | Round 7 | VITAS | 16 | 3♣ | ♠Q | -4 | -2 |
| -3.3 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 6 | 3NT | ♠A | -2 | -6 |
| -3.3 | Round 6 | GANZER | 8 | 4♥x | ♣8 | -1 | -11 |
| -3.4 | Round 6 | GANZER | 11 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +3 | -10 |
| -4.2 | Round 7 | VITAS | 18 | 5♦ | ♣9 | +2 | -17 |
| -4.2 | Round 7 | VITAS | 20 | 2♠ | ♦J | +2 | -2 |
| -4.2 | Round 7 | VITAS | 21 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -4.6 | Round 5 | MCALLISTER | 6 | 2♠ | ♦K | +2 | -7 |
| -5.0 | Round 6 | GANZER | 12 | 4♥ | ♦Q | +2 | -12 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 27 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | -7 |
| -6.4 | Round 1 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 1 | 3NT | ♦6 | +3 | -2 |
| -7.1 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 23 | 6♥ | ♦3 | -1 | -17 |
| -8.1 | Round 4 | DALIAN | 22 | 6♦ | ♥Q | = | +2 |