ZHOU Guangbin · DALIAN
vs par split: bidding +1.54 · play +0.64
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.54/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.73/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% #254 of 398 · declarer play 85.7% #68 of 398 · defence 72.2% #381 of 399
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 66.7% (3) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 50.0% (4) | 78.6% (14) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (5) · a suit +2.65 (23)
vs par by level: part-score -2.20 (5) · game +0.78 (18) · slam +11.60 (5)
By role: declaring +0.03/bd (-1.60 vs par · 10) · defending +1.95/bd (+4.28 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.54/bd (+1.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +1.99/bd (+3.21 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | X.Li | Z.Pu – S.Shi | Open | 7 | +7.4 | +1.06 | +0.86 |
| Round 4 | X.Li | X.Li – Y.Wang | Open | 7 | -3.0 | -0.43 | +0.57 |
| Round 6 | X.Li | H.Tian – H.Zhao | Open | 7 | +30.5 | +4.36 | +5.86 |
| Round 8 | X.Li | E.Ginossar – R.Barr | Open | 7 | +0.5 | +0.07 | +1.43 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.1 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 12 | 6♥ | ♣2 | -1 | +17 |
| +10.4 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 8 | 6♥x | ♣6 | -3 | +14 |
| +9.9 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 8 | 6♥x | ♠A | = | +12 |
| +8.1 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 22 | 6♦ | ♥Q | = | -2 |
| +8.0 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 12 | 4♠ | ♦8 | -1 | +12 |
| +7.1 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 23 | 6♥ | ♦3 | -1 | +17 |
| +4.7 | Round 8 | BARR | 23 | 5♣ | ♠3 | -2 | +12 |
| +3.2 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 11 | 3NT | ♣10 | +4 | +10 |
| +2.7 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 14 | 5♥ | ♠7 | -1 | +8 |
| +2.5 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 27 | 5♣ | ♦K | -1 | +4 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | BARR | 24 | 4♠ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 8 | BARR | 25 | 5♠x | ♦A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round 8 | BARR | 22 | 2♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +4 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 13 | 1NT | ♠8 | -2 | -9 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 13 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 9 | 4♥ | ♣9 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 8 | BARR | 28 | 4♥ | ♣2 | -2 | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 25 | 3NT | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 6 | QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 10 | 4♥ | ♠7 | = | +1 |
| -1.4 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 9 | 2♠ | ♦4 | +1 | -7 |
| -2.1 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 11 | 3♦ | ♥5 | = | +1 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 10 | 3NT | ♥A | +1 | -1 |
| -3.8 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 28 | 4♥ | ♣5 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.1 | Round 8 | BARR | 26 | 3♥ | ♣Q | -1 | +0 |
| -4.2 | Round 2 | RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF CAS | 14 | 5♠ | ♥4 | -1 | -11 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | BARR | 27 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | -7 |
| -8.3 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 26 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| -8.5 | Round 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 24 | 4♥ | ♦J | -1 | -11 |