CHEN Anning · SHANDONGPUSHI TEAM
vs par split: bidding -1.43 · play +0.43
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -1.13/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -2.61/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (5) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.00 (1) · a suit -1.00 (6)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (3) · game -1.75 (4)
By role: declaring +1.10/bd (+1.00 vs par · 1) · defending -1.92/bd (-1.33 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.23/bd (+0.75 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -1.83/bd (-3.33 vs par · 3)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | M.Li | J.Shi – Y.Du | Open | 7 | -10.4 | -1.49 | -1.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.8 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 3 | 2♠ | ♣3 | +1 | +7 |
| +1.1 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 2 | 4♥ | ♠J | +2 | +1 |
| -0.7 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 5 | 1NT | ♠4 | -1 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 6 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | +1 |
| -1.9 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 7 | 2♥ | ♣6 | = | -6 |
| -3.3 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 4 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | +1 |
| -5.9 | Round 5 | BEIJING CENTURY WEIDA | 1 | 4♠ | ♥2 | -1 | -10 |