STERNBERG James Marsh · STERNBERG

27rank
-4.7Butler · 14 bds
-0.34per board
±4.9swing
-0.57vs par /bd
+0.54adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.57 · play +0.00

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.88/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.54/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 75.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)83.3% (6)
Declarer play·100.0% (2)
Defence0.0% (1)85.7% (7)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 50.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +0.50 (2) · a suit -0.75 (12)

vs par by level: part-score -0.75 (4) · game -2.25 (8) · slam +6.50 (2)

By role: declaring +0.78/bd (-1.67 vs par · 6) · defending -1.18/bd (+0.25 vs par · 8)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.81/bd (+0.71 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +2.14/bd (-1.86 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalB.EisenbergJ.Holland – C.MariOpen14-4.7-0.34-0.57

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+7.7SemifinalHACKETT65♦♣7-1-7
+5.7SemifinalHACKETT143NT♣Q+2+2
+4.7SemifinalHACKETT54♣♥K-1+5
+4.0SemifinalHACKETT114♠♥4=+0
+2.0SemifinalHACKETT33♥♠K=+0
+0.0SemifinalHACKETT74♥♦7=+0
+0.0SemifinalHACKETT124♥♣A-1-6
-0.7SemifinalHACKETT15♦♥A+1+0
-1.0SemifinalHACKETT26♦♣K=+0
-1.7SemifinalHACKETT82♠♣A-1-8
-2.0SemifinalHACKETT93♠♥J=+0
-6.0SemifinalHACKETT44♥♣2-1-6
-7.7SemifinalHACKETT133NT♥Q+1-1
-9.7SemifinalHACKETT106♣♠K=+13