LYNCH Carolyn · LYNCH

42rank
-39.9Butler · 14 bds
-2.85per board
±4.5swing
-0.50vs par /bd
-2.17adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.07 · play -0.43

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.68/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -2.17/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 33.3% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 33.3%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads33.3% (3)·
Declarer play·100.0% (3)
Defence40.0% (5)0.0% (1)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 50.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT -3.11 (9) · a suit +4.20 (5)

vs par by level: part-score +3.67 (3) · game +0.10 (10) · slam -19.00 (1)

By role: declaring -1.16/bd (+5.25 vs par · 8) · defending -5.10/bd (-8.17 vs par · 6)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -4.69/bd (-3.86 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.01/bd (+2.86 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
QuarterfinalM.PassellJ.Schermer – N.ChambersOpen14-39.9-2.85-0.50

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+5.3QuarterfinalSTERNBERG24♠♥Q+2+18
+2.6QuarterfinalSTERNBERG144♠♦J+2+13
+1.1QuarterfinalSTERNBERG43NT♠5+1+13
+0.7QuarterfinalSTERNBERG13NT♦A-1-10
-1.6QuarterfinalSTERNBERG73NT♣J-1-12
-2.0QuarterfinalSTERNBERG83♥♦K-1+8
-2.0QuarterfinalSTERNBERG113NT♣3+1+0
-2.7QuarterfinalSTERNBERG64NT♠4=-1
-3.4QuarterfinalSTERNBERG52♠♣9+1+1
-3.7QuarterfinalSTERNBERG31NT♣10=+2
-6.0QuarterfinalSTERNBERG103NT♣5+2-21
-7.9QuarterfinalSTERNBERG136♥♠A=-19
-8.3QuarterfinalSTERNBERG123NT♠4+1-10
-12.0QuarterfinalSTERNBERG94NT♦4+3+11