Salsoyouth 2022 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Butler vs double-dummy par↑ top

IMPs per board scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s minimax par — what real bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect double-dummy play. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	/board	Total
1	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	+2.18	+109.0
2	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	+2.18	+109.0
3	W.Chen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	+2.12	+85.0
4	H.Yang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	+2.12	+85.0
5	A.Montesanti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	+1.30	+65.0
6	M.Tonelli	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	+1.30	+65.0
7	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	+1.08	+54.0
8	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	+1.08	+54.0
9	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	+1.06	+53.0
10	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	+1.06	+53.0
11	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	+0.78	+39.0
12	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	+0.78	+39.0
13	A.Chang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	20	+0.05	+1.0
14	H.Chuang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	20	+0.05	+1.0
15	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.10	-5.0
16	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.10	-5.0
17	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.16	-8.0
18	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.16	-8.0
19	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.54	-27.0
20	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.54	-27.0
21	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	-0.58	-29.0
22	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	-0.58	-29.0
23	R.Di Mauro	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	-3.58	-179.0
24	A.Rotolico	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	-3.58	-179.0
25	Y.Cheng	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	-3.95	-158.0
26	S.Yen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	-3.95	-158.0

Opening-lead accuracy↑ top

How often a player’s opening lead held declarer to the same tricks as the best defensive lead double-dummy. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Leads	On target	Conceded
1	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	11	100.0%	0.00
2	W.Chen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	10	100.0%	0.00
3	M.Tonelli	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	15	100.0%	0.00
4	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	9	100.0%	0.00
5	A.Chang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	5	100.0%	0.00
6	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	14	92.9%	0.07
7	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	13	92.3%	0.08
8	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	12	91.7%	0.08
9	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	11	90.9%	0.09
10	Y.Cheng	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	10	90.0%	0.10
11	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	9	88.9%	0.11
12	S.Yen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	9	88.9%	0.11
13	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	16	87.5%	0.19
14	R.Di Mauro	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	7	85.7%	0.29
15	H.Yang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	13	84.6%	0.15
16	A.Montesanti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	12	83.3%	0.17
17	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	12	83.3%	0.25
18	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	17	82.4%	0.23
19	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	14	78.6%	0.21
20	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	9	77.8%	0.22
21	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	13	76.9%	0.39
22	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	12	75.0%	0.25
23	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	11	72.7%	0.46
24	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	17	70.6%	0.35
25	A.Rotolico	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	16	68.8%	0.69
26	H.Chuang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	3	66.7%	0.33

Declarer-play accuracy↑ top

How often declarer took at least the double-dummy makeable tricks after the actual opening lead — i.e. didn’t leave tricks on the table. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Contracts	On target	Conceded
1	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	10	100.0%	0.00
2	H.Yang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	5	100.0%	0.00
3	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	12	91.7%	0.08
4	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	9	88.9%	0.11
5	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	17	88.2%	0.12
6	A.Chang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	7	85.7%	0.14
7	A.Montesanti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	13	84.6%	0.15
8	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	12	83.3%	0.17
9	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	12	83.3%	0.17
10	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	16	81.2%	0.19
11	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	10	80.0%	0.30
12	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	15	80.0%	0.33
13	W.Chen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	12	75.0%	0.42
14	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	15	73.3%	0.33
15	Y.Cheng	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	11	72.7%	0.36
16	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	7	71.4%	0.43
17	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	16	68.8%	0.44
18	A.Rotolico	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	15	66.7%	0.47
19	R.Di Mauro	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	12	66.7%	0.50
20	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	8	62.5%	0.38
21	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	16	62.5%	0.50
22	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	10	60.0%	0.40
23	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	15	60.0%	0.73
24	S.Yen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	10	60.0%	0.90
25	M.Tonelli	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	10	50.0%	0.80
26	H.Chuang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	5	40.0%	0.80

Defensive accuracy↑ top

How often the defenders held declarer to the double-dummy makeable (or fewer) — charged to both defenders on the board. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	On target	Conceded
1	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	28	92.9%	0.07
2	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	28	92.9%	0.07
3	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	22	90.9%	0.14
4	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	22	90.9%	0.14
5	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	88.5%	0.19
6	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	88.5%	0.19
7	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	25	88.0%	0.16
8	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	25	88.0%	0.16
9	W.Chen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	23	87.0%	0.22
10	H.Yang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	23	87.0%	0.22
11	A.Montesanti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	27	85.2%	0.15
12	M.Tonelli	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	27	85.2%	0.15
13	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	23	82.6%	0.17
14	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	23	82.6%	0.17
15	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	27	81.5%	0.18
16	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	27	81.5%	0.18
17	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	80.8%	0.27
18	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	80.8%	0.27
19	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	23	78.3%	0.22
20	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	23	78.3%	0.22
21	R.Di Mauro	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	23	73.9%	0.35
22	A.Rotolico	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	23	73.9%	0.35
23	Y.Cheng	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	19	63.2%	0.47
24	S.Yen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	19	63.2%	0.47
25	A.Chang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	8	62.5%	0.50
26	H.Chuang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	8	62.5%	0.50

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	Opp /bd	Raw /bd	Adj /bd	Δ
1	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.51	+1.67	+1.16	·
2	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.51	+1.67	+1.16	·
3	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	-0.01	+0.96	+0.95	▲2
4	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	-0.01	+0.96	+0.95	▲2
5	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.18	+0.99	+0.81	▼2
6	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	-0.18	+0.99	+0.81	▼2
7	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	+0.76	-0.05	+0.71	▲10
8	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	+0.76	-0.05	+0.71	▲10
9	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.16	+0.79	+0.63	▼2
10	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	50	-0.16	+0.79	+0.63	▼2
11	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	-0.33	+0.69	+0.35	▼2
12	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	50	-0.33	+0.69	+0.35	▼2
13	A.Montesanti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	-0.13	+0.08	-0.06	▲2
14	M.Tonelli	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	-0.13	+0.08	-0.06	▲2
15	W.Chen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	-0.27	+0.10	-0.16	▼2
16	H.Yang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	-0.27	+0.10	-0.16	▼2
17	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	-0.89	+0.61	-0.28	▼6
18	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	50	-0.89	+0.61	-0.28	▼6
19	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	+0.47	-1.36	-0.89	▲2
20	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	+0.47	-1.36	-0.89	▲2
21	A.Chang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	20	-0.29	-0.67	-0.96	▼2
22	H.Chuang	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	20	-0.29	-0.67	-0.96	▼2
23	Y.Cheng	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	+0.83	-1.88	-1.05	·
24	S.Yen	🇹🇼 TAIWAN	40	+0.83	-1.88	-1.05	·
25	R.Di Mauro	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	+0.64	-2.69	-2.05	·
26	A.Rotolico	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED	50	+0.64	-2.69	-2.05	·

Stages

Statistics