🇺🇸 XU Michael · USA U26
vs par split: bidding +2.12 · play -0.04
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.04/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.26/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 79 · defence 77.8% #46 of 79
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 50.0% (6) | 91.7% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -0.44 (9) · a suit +3.60 (15)
vs par by level: part-score +1.25 (12) · game +3.18 (11) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring -2.13/bd (-0.83 vs par · 6) · defending +0.31/bd (+3.06 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.06/bd (+1.69 vs par · 13) · not vulnerable +0.59/bd (+2.54 vs par · 11)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | F.Kolesnik | A.Loprevite – V.Fresa | Closed | 6 | +11.5 | +1.92 | +3.50 |
| Round 4 | F.Kolesnik | E.Evacic – I.Bilusic | Open | 6 | -2.2 | -0.37 | +2.00 |
| Round 5 | F.Kolesnik | N.Khutorsky – A.Zeitak | Closed | 6 | -18.0 | -3.00 | +2.00 |
| Round 6 | F.Kolesnik | E.Vallet – P.Bedouet | Open | 6 | +1.4 | +0.23 | +0.83 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.5 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 6 | 2♥x | ♠2 | -3 | +9 |
| +6.2 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 21 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | +12 |
| +6.1 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 2 | 3NT | ♥Q | -1 | +10 |
| +2.3 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 3 | 4♥ | ♣9 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.1 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 5 | 1NT | ♦7 | -1 | -1 |
| +1.5 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 2 | 2♥ | ♦J | +2 | -1 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 27 | 3NT | ♣Q | +1 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 4 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | +7 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 20 | 4♥ | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 22 | 5♦x | ♣9 | -2 | +4 |
| -0.9 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 28 | 1NT | ♠3 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.4 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 1 | 3♦ | ♣2 | +2 | -4 |
| -1.5 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 23 | 1NT | ♦8 | +1 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 3 | 3♠ | ♣K | -1 | +3 |
| -1.6 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 4 | 1NT | ♦2 | -2 | -2 |
| -1.9 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 5 | 3♥ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 30 | 3♥ | ♣6 | +1 | +6 |
| -2.3 | Round 6 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE U22 | 6 | 3NT | ♣5 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.7 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 26 | 5♣ | ♠K | -1 | +12 |
| -2.9 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 19 | 5♦ | ♥8 | = | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 4 | 🇭🇷 CROATIA U26 | 24 | 3NT | ♥2 | -4 | -3 |
| -3.7 | Round 1 | 🇮🇹 ITALY U26 RED | 1 | 4♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -5.6 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 29 | 3NT | ♠5 | -1 | -6 |
| -7.6 | Round 5 | BRIDGENOOBS | 25 | 6♣ | ♦Q | = | +0 |