BERNAL Daniela · ECUADOR
vs par split: bidding -1.29 · play -2.43
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.78/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -3.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 81.8% #25 of 46 · declarer play 16.7% #44 of 46 · defence 61.9% #43 of 46
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 81.8% (11) |
| Declarer play | 33.3% (3) | 0.0% (3) |
| Defence | 0.0% (1) | 65.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 60.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT -7.25 (8) · a suit -2.67 (27)
vs par by level: part-score -1.77 (13) · game -5.89 (18) · slam -0.25 (4)
By role: declaring -4.74/bd (-7.13 vs par · 15) · defending -3.62/bd (-0.91 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -4.38/bd (-1.69 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -3.86/bd (-4.95 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | I.Bernal | A.Chen – B.Zhang | Open | 9 | -58.5 | -6.50 | -2.00 |
| Round 3 | I.Bernal | R.Taranto – M.De Angelis | Closed | 9 | -27.6 | -3.07 | -2.56 |
| Round 4 | I.Bernal | S.Zaidenberg Gatt – A.Zaidenberg Gatt | Closed | 9 | -35.8 | -3.98 | -4.89 |
| Round 5 | I.Bernal | A.Parekh – W.Battersby | Open | 9 | -25.3 | -2.81 | -4.56 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.4 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 16 | 4♥ | ♦K | -1 | +5 |
| +2.6 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 9 | 4♠ | ♣5 | -1 | +6 |
| +1.9 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 13 | 4♥ | ♦6 | -1 | -1 |
| +1.4 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 29 | 3♠ | ♣4 | -1 | +5 |
| +0.9 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 21 | 1NT | ♣3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 11 | 2NT | ♥4 | = | -7 |
| +0.7 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 2 | Pass | +4 | ||
| +0.4 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 6 | 3♥ | ♣5 | +2 | +9 |
| -0.0 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 12 | 4♦ | ♣7 | -2 | -12 |
| -0.6 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 7 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 23 | 2♠ | ♦6 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.8 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 15 | 2♠ | ♥7 | = | -7 |
| -1.4 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 22 | 2♠ | ♥8 | -1 | +7 |
| -2.7 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 6 | 4♦ | ♥Q | = | -7 |
| -2.8 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 9 | 2NT | ♦3 | -4 | -2 |
| -3.9 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 1 | 4♥ | ♠2 | -4 | -16 |
| -4.1 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 2 | 4♥ | ♣5 | +2 | -2 |
| -4.3 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 24 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | -10 |
| -4.7 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 8 | 3♥ | ♠Q | = | -7 |
| -4.8 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 4 | 3NT | ♣7 | +2 | -1 |
| -4.8 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 26 | 4♥ | ♦4 | +1 | -10 |
| -5.1 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 27 | 6♠ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -5.1 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 18 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | -8 |
| -5.8 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 1 | 4♥ | ♦6 | +1 | +0 |
| -6.0 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 28 | 4♠ | ♦10 | -3 | -11 |
| -6.7 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 14 | 2♠ | ♦4 | +1 | -1 |
| -7.2 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 3 | 2NT | ♣A | -2 | -11 |
| -7.6 | Round 3 | ITALY U16 | 25 | 5♦ | ♥4 | -3 | -14 |
| -8.7 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 17 | 3NT | ♥3 | -1 | -10 |
| -9.0 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 8 | 4♥ | ♦9 | -1 | -10 |
| -9.2 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 3 | 5♦ | ♠Q | = | +5 |
| -9.2 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 5 | 6♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -9.7 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 5 | 4♥ | ♣5 | -1 | -12 |
| -10.9 | Round 1 | USS UNSINKABLE | 7 | 6♠ | ♥7 | = | -1 |
| -11.2 | Round 5 | ENGLAND U16 | 19 | 6♠ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| -13.4 | Round 4 | ECUAEL | 4 | 4NT | ♠8 | -2 | -17 |