Salsoyouth 2022 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Butler vs double-dummy par↑ top

IMPs per board scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s minimax par — what real bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect double-dummy play. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	/board	Total
1	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	+1.30	+127.0
2	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	+1.30	+127.0
3	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.81	+91.0
4	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.81	+91.0
5	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.58	+57.0
6	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.58	+57.0
7	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	+0.52	+58.0
8	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	+0.52	+58.0
9	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	+0.33	+37.0
10	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	+0.33	+37.0
11	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	-0.94	-105.0
12	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	-0.94	-105.0
13	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	-1.10	-108.0
14	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	-1.10	-108.0
15	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-1.60	-157.0
16	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-1.60	-157.0

Opening-lead accuracy↑ top

How often a player’s opening lead held declarer to the same tricks as the best defensive lead double-dummy. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Leads	On target	Conceded
1	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	28	89.3%	0.11
2	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	35	88.6%	0.11
3	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	29	86.2%	0.14
4	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	84.6%	0.15
5	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	24	83.3%	0.21
6	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	32	81.2%	0.19
7	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	23	78.3%	0.30
8	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	35	77.1%	0.31
9	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	26	76.9%	0.27
10	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	21	76.2%	0.33
11	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	21	76.2%	0.38
12	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	20	75.0%	0.30
13	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	31	74.2%	0.42
14	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	29	72.4%	0.34
15	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	17	64.7%	0.53
16	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	23	52.2%	0.52

Declarer-play accuracy↑ top

How often declarer took at least the double-dummy makeable tricks after the actual opening lead — i.e. didn’t leave tricks on the table. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Contracts	On target	Conceded
1	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	27	96.3%	0.04
2	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	25	92.0%	0.16
3	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	27	81.5%	0.22
4	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	36	80.6%	0.31
5	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	24	79.2%	0.29
6	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	33	78.8%	0.27
7	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	30	76.7%	0.23
8	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	28	75.0%	0.39
9	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	30	73.3%	0.33
10	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	26	73.1%	0.39
11	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	25	72.0%	0.32
12	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	21	71.4%	0.29
13	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	21	71.4%	0.38
14	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	21	71.4%	0.38
15	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	22	63.6%	0.41
16	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	24	54.2%	0.58

Defensive accuracy↑ top

How often the defenders held declarer to the double-dummy makeable (or fewer) — charged to both defenders on the board. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	On target	Conceded
1	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	59	88.1%	0.14
2	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	59	88.1%	0.14
3	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	48	87.5%	0.17
4	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	48	87.5%	0.17
5	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	52	84.6%	0.19
6	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	52	84.6%	0.19
7	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	51	80.4%	0.26
8	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	51	80.4%	0.26
9	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	80.0%	0.24
10	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	50	80.0%	0.24
11	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	52	78.8%	0.29
12	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	52	78.8%	0.29
13	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	52	76.9%	0.29
14	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	52	76.9%	0.29
15	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	56	75.0%	0.32
16	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	56	75.0%	0.32

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#	Player	Team	Boards	Opp /bd	Raw /bd	Adj /bd	Δ
1	A.Kjensli	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	-0.49	+1.14	+0.65	·
2	M.Statle	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	-0.49	+1.14	+0.65	·
3	K.Brekke	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	-0.52	+0.96	+0.44	·
4	T.Indrebo	🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS	112	-0.52	+0.96	+0.44	·
5	K.Baliram Gurjar	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.68	-0.48	+0.20	▲6
6	V.Kamal Patel	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.68	-0.48	+0.20	▲6
7	S.Capobianco	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.49	-0.48	+0.01	▲2
8	E.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.49	-0.48	+0.01	▲2
9	F.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.45	-0.52	-0.08	▲4
10	V.Dalpozzo	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN	112	+0.45	-0.52	-0.08	▲4
11	S.Basu	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.43	-0.55	-0.12	▲4
12	R.Bhimanaik	🇮🇳 INDIA U26G	98	+0.43	-0.55	-0.12	▲4
13	A.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-0.49	+0.12	-0.37	▼8
14	M.Pelaggi	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-0.49	+0.12	-0.37	▼8
15	C.Brusotti	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-0.52	-0.35	-0.87	▼8
16	Z.Davide	🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE	98	-0.52	-0.35	-0.87	▼8

Stages

Statistics