🇸🇪 LARHNIMI Hakim · SWEDEN
vs par split: bidding +0.25 · play -0.12
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.62/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.55/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 33.3% · defence 80.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 30.0% (6/20)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 0.0% (1) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (4) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -2.67 (3) · a suit +1.80 (5)
vs par by level: part-score +1.67 (3) · game -0.80 (5)
By role: declaring -3.67/bd (-6.67 vs par · 3) · defending +0.34/bd (+4.20 vs par · 5)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.62/bd (+2.75 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -3.95/bd (-2.50 vs par · 4)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 9 | M.Bertheau | A.Shek – J.Chiang | Closed | 8 | -9.3 | -1.16 | +0.12 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.5 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 3 | 1NT | ♠Q | -2 | +6 |
| +1.6 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 8 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +5 |
| +1.4 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 7 | 3♦ | ♣K | -1 | +5 |
| +0.7 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 6 | 3♠ | ♥T | -1 | -6 |
| -0.1 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 4 | 4♥ | ♠9 | -1 | +6 |
| -2.5 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 2 | 3NT | ♥9 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.7 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 1 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | -1 |
| -9.2 | Round 9 | 🇭🇰 HONG KONG CHINA | 5 | 3NTx | ♣6 | -2 | -9 |