🇺🇸 CHEN Kyo · USA1
19rank
+1.4Butler · 12 bds
+0.12per board
±4.9swing
+1.25vs par /bd
+0.38adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.26/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.38/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 33.3% (12/36)
vs par by strain: NT +2.20 (5) · a suit +0.57 (7)
vs par by level: part-score -3.40 (5) · game +4.20 (5) · slam +5.50 (2)
By role: declaring +1.00/bd (-1.25 vs par · 4) · defending -0.33/bd (+2.50 vs par · 8)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.29/bd (+0.14 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.52/bd (+2.80 vs par · 5)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | A.Shih | M.Blicharz – H.Ozibko | Open | 12 | +1.4 | +0.12 | +1.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 21 | 7NT | = | +0 | |
| +5.7 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 19 | 4♥ | -3 | +10 | |
| +3.7 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 20 | 3NT | = | +11 | |
| +3.3 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 17 | 3♥ | -2 | -1 | |
| +1.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 13 | 3♦ | -1 | +3 | |
| -0.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 18 | 3NT | +1 | +0 | |
| -0.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 23 | 3NT | = | +0 | |
| -1.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 14 | 3♥ | +1 | -1 | |
| -2.3 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 22 | 6♦ | = | +11 | |
| -4.7 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 15 | 3♦ | +1 | -10 | |
| -7.0 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 24 | 3♣ | -2 | -8 | |
| -7.3 | Final | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 16 | 3NT | +1 | +0 |