🇮🇱 SAADA Nathalie · ISRAEL Mixed
vs par split: bidding +0.87 · play -0.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.21/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.11/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 135 · declarer play 77.8% #51 of 135 · defence 76.5% #115 of 135
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (3) | 66.7% (6) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 80.0% (15) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +1.40 (5) · a suit +0.64 (25)
vs par by level: part-score +1.43 (14) · game +1.17 (12) · slam -2.75 (4)
By role: declaring -1.31/bd (-1.77 vs par · 13) · defending +1.57/bd (+2.71 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.14/bd (+1.29 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +0.48/bd (+0.31 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | I.Bareket | J.Harris – J.Smith | Closed | 10 | +7.5 | +0.75 | +0.10 |
| Round 3 | I.Bareket | R.Marsal – H.Klumpp | Closed | 10 | -3.6 | -0.36 | +3.00 |
| Round 5 | I.Bareket | A.Grossack – E.Kolesnik | Open | 10 | +5.7 | +0.57 | -0.80 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.7 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 14 | 4♦x | ♥3 | -4 | +12 |
| +7.2 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 16 | 3♠ | ♣A | -4 | +0 |
| +6.5 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 12 | 2♠ | ♣A | -2 | +3 |
| +6.1 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 20 | 3NT | ♦3 | +1 | +1 |
| +5.7 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 16 | 5♣ | ♠K | -1 | +5 |
| +5.3 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 12 | 4♥ | ♣3 | +2 | +11 |
| +4.7 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 18 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | +6 |
| +3.1 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 11 | 2♠ | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 15 | 2♠ | ♦10 | = | +6 |
| +1.4 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 26 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | +6 |
| +1.3 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 13 | 4♥ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 24 | 4♥ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 25 | 6♣ | ♥8 | +1 | +11 |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 17 | 2♠ | ♦2 | -1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 21 | 2♠ | ♥A | +1 | -2 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 22 | 3♣ | ♦5 | -1 | +7 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 19 | 4NT | ♥9 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 13 | 7♦ | ♠9 | = | +2 |
| +0.0 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 27 | 3NT | ♥6 | +2 | +10 |
| -0.3 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 23 | 3♦ | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 29 | 1NT | ♥Q | -1 | +1 |
| -1.1 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 30 | 2♣ | ♣2 | = | +2 |
| -3.3 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 14 | 3♠ | ♦6 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.9 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 18 | 4♦ | ♣K | +1 | -4 |
| -4.4 | Round 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMAN SENIORS | 28 | 1NT | ♠Q | +1 | -5 |
| -7.6 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 20 | 6♣ | ♦2 | -1 | -12 |
| -8.3 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 15 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | -9 |
| -8.5 | Round 5 | 🇺🇸 USA 1 Women | 19 | 5♠x | ♣A | -4 | -16 |
| -11.0 | Round 2 | 🇨🇦 CANADA VANZUS | 17 | 6♥x | ♦A | -3 | -12 |