ROBINSON Craig · HORN LAKE 6
34rank
+13.7Butler · 20 bds
+0.69per board
±5.6swing
+0.92adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.24/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.92/bd
By role: declaring +0.23/bd (11) · defending +1.24/bd (9)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +0.69/bd (20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | E.Landow | S.Cooper – K.Munson-Cooper | Open | 10 | +11.9 | +1.19 | · |
| Round 4 | E.Landow | K.Sanborn – R.Ekeblad | Closed | 10 | +1.8 | +0.18 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +15.6 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 10 | 4♠ | ♥Q | +1 | · |
| +6.7 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 7 | 3♣ | ♥A | +2 | · |
| +5.9 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 1 | 6♥ | ♠3 | = | · |
| +4.8 | Round 3 | COOPER | 29 | 4♥ | ♠9 | -2 | · |
| +4.1 | Round 3 | COOPER | 23 | 2N | ♦7 | +1 | · |
| +3.9 | Round 3 | COOPER | 24 | 4♠ | ♦A | = | · |
| +3.3 | Round 3 | COOPER | 25 | 3♥ | ♦A | -1 | · |
| +2.4 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 4 | 2♠ | ♣J | +1 | · |
| +0.8 | Round 3 | COOPER | 28 | 2♠ | ♠A | +2 | · |
| +0.6 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 3 | 4♥ | ♦A | -1 | · |
| +0.0 | Round 3 | COOPER | 30 | 4♠ | ♥Q | +1 | · |
| -0.1 | Round 3 | COOPER | 27 | 2♦ | ♠Q | -1 | · |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | COOPER | 22 | 4♣ | ♥Q | = | · |
| -1.3 | Round 3 | COOPER | 26 | 3N | ♦3 | +1 | · |
| -2.9 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 6 | 3♠ | ♦5 | -1 | · |
| -3.0 | Round 3 | COOPER | 21 | 2♠ | ♥K | = | · |
| -3.2 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 2 | 2N | ♠6 | -2 | · |
| -4.8 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 8 | 3♥ | ♣3 | -1 | · |
| -6.4 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 5 | 2♥ | ♣K | +3 | · |
| -12.1 | Round 4 | EKEBLAD | 9 | 4♠x | ♣K | -5 | · |