BLASS Josef · PSZCZOLA
vs par split: bidding +1.10 · play -0.50
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.09/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.48/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 87.5% · declarer play 28.6% · defence 68.8%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 33.3% (6) |
| Defence | 66.7% (6) | 70.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -0.67 (9) · a suit +1.14 (21)
vs par by level: part-score -0.31 (16) · game +0.92 (13) · slam +11.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.03/bd (-1.00 vs par · 14) · defending -0.72/bd (+2.00 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.54/bd (+2.07 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -1.34/bd (-0.87 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | J.Pszczola | M.Di Franco – A.Manno | Closed | 10 | -8.2 | -0.82 | +2.10 |
| Round 2 | J.Pszczola | K.Venkataraman – A.Goel | Closed | 10 | -11.3 | -1.13 | -1.70 |
| Round 4 | J.Pszczola | J.Munday – R.Pavlicek | Closed | 10 | +7.5 | +0.75 | +1.40 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.3 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 15 | 5♠x | ♣5 | = | +15 |
| +5.0 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 17 | 2♦ | ♣A | -2 | +8 |
| +3.7 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 15 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | +6 |
| +3.3 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 9 | 4♦ | ♥8 | +1 | +6 |
| +3.3 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 12 | 3♠ | ♥10 | = | +1 |
| +2.9 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 13 | 1NT | ♥A | -1 | +6 |
| +2.7 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 5 | 2♠ | ♠J | -2 | +7 |
| +2.5 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 7 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 4 | 5♦ | ♥7 | +1 | +10 |
| +1.6 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 13 | 4♥ | ♦J | +2 | +1 |
| +1.2 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 1 | 3♠ | ♥J | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 16 | 4♠ | ♦A | +2 | +11 |
| +0.4 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 16 | 1NT | ♥5 | -1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 12 | 1NT | ♦2 | -2 | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 18 | 3NT | ♠Q | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 10 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 19 | 4♠ | ♣J | -1 | -12 |
| -1.5 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 11 | 1NT | ♦4 | -1 | -2 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 18 | 2♥ | ♠7 | +2 | -2 |
| -2.4 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 14 | 2♦ | ♣A | +1 | -5 |
| -2.9 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 2 | 3♥ | ♦10 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.1 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 20 | 1NT | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 20 | 2♠ | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -3.4 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 14 | 3NT | ♦3 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.8 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 3 | 6♠ | ♥7 | +1 | +11 |
| -3.9 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 11 | 4♦ | ♣K | -2 | -8 |
| -4.0 | Round 4 | PAVLICEK | 19 | 4♥ | ♥5 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.8 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 8 | 4♠x | ♥K | -3 | -2 |
| -6.7 | Round 1 | DE MICHELIS | 6 | 2NT | ♥10 | +1 | -10 |
| -9.2 | Round 2 | DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS | 17 | 4♥x | ♦3 | -1 | -11 |