BERNAL Francisco · ROMAMIAMI
vs par split: bidding -1.93 · play +0.07
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.13/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.42/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 77.8%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 85.7% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -2.00 (3) · a suit -1.82 (11)
vs par by level: part-score -1.17 (6) · game -3.50 (6) · slam +1.00 (2)
By role: declaring -1.80/bd (-5.20 vs par · 5) · defending -1.40/bd (+0.00 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -3.37/bd (-3.00 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +0.29/bd (-0.71 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | I.Kislitsyna | J.Shih – P.Wang | Open | 14 | -21.6 | -1.54 | -1.86 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.3 | Round of 64 | YBM | 24 | 3♣x | ♣4 | -2 | +4 |
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | YBM | 16 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | YBM | 19 | 3♦ | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | YBM | 17 | 2♥ | ♠Q | -1 | -2 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 20 | 3NT | ♠4 | +3 | -1 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | YBM | 21 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | YBM | 27 | 2♦ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | YBM | 18 | 1NT | ♦Q | = | -5 |
| -2.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 26 | 3♠ | ♣K | -1 | -5 |
| -4.4 | Round of 64 | YBM | 25 | 5♣ | ♦A | -1 | -10 |
| -5.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 22 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | +2 |
| -8.1 | Round of 64 | YBM | 15 | 5♥x | ♣K | -1 | -11 |
| -8.8 | Round of 64 | YBM | 28 | 7♣ | ♣9 | = | +0 |