BACH Ashley · MCCALLUM
vs par split: bidding +0.79 · play -0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.10/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.57/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (4) | 80.0% (5) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 69.2% (13) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.33 (9) · a suit +0.74 (19)
vs par by level: part-score -1.08 (13) · game +0.36 (14) · slam +11.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.34/bd (-1.61 vs par · 13) · defending +0.09/bd (+1.53 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.01/bd (-0.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +1.32/bd (+0.29 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | K.Mccallum | B.Zhang – N.Wang | Closed | 14 | +10.3 | +0.74 | -0.36 |
| Round of 64 | K.Mccallum | N.Wang – B.Zhang | Open | 14 | +8.4 | +0.60 | +0.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 9 | 3NT | ♦7 | = | +11 |
| +8.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 19 | 3NT | ♠4 | = | +7 |
| +6.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 22 | 4♠ | ♥A | +2 | +13 |
| +4.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 7 | 2♣ | ♥8 | -2 | +3 |
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 16 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 14 | 3♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 26 | 3♦ | ♥K | -1 | +0 |
| +2.6 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 17 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -2 | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 11 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +3 |
| +2.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 8 | 3♦ | ♣Q | +3 | +13 |
| +1.8 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 15 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 28 | 6♣ | ♥6 | +1 | +11 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 12 | 3NT | ♣8 | +3 | -11 |
| +1.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 5 | 4♠ | ♣J | = | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 1 | 1NT | ♠A | = | -2 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 2 | 2NT | ♥7 | +2 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 20 | 3NT | ♥9 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 13 | 3♥ | ♦8 | = | -10 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 21 | 4♠ | ♣Q | = | +1 |
| -2.5 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 10 | 2♦ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 18 | 1NT | ♥4 | +1 | -6 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 27 | 3♣ | ♥K | -3 | -1 |
| -3.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 4 | 2♥ | ♥K | = | -6 |
| -3.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 24 | 2♠ | ♠A | = | -6 |
| -4.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 3 | 4♠ | ♣J | -1 | -6 |
| -5.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 6 | 4♠ | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| -7.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 25 | 3NT | ♠9 | -4 | -12 |