BOMPIS Marc · ZIMMERMANN
vs par split: bidding +0.18 · play -0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.18/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.09/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 71.4% · defence 80.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 85.7% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -2.50 (8) · a suit +0.25 (20)
vs par by level: part-score +0.85 (13) · game -1.00 (13) · slam -6.50 (2)
By role: declaring +0.30/bd (-2.33 vs par · 18) · defending -0.80/bd (+2.70 vs par · 10)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.56/bd (-0.71 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +0.37/bd (-0.36 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | C.D'Ovidio | S.Jones – P.Ware | Closed | 14 | -2.3 | -0.16 | -1.21 |
| Round of 64 | C.D'Ovidio | J.Carmichael – T.Carmichael | Closed | 14 | -0.3 | -0.02 | +0.14 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 13 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | +1 |
| +6.4 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 15 | 5♥ | ♣K | -1 | +9 |
| +5.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 22 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | -2 |
| +4.8 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 19 | 1NT | ♣6 | -3 | +6 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 8 | 3♦ | ♣A | +2 | +13 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 14 | 3♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | +3 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 26 | 3♠ | ♣A | -1 | +5 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 2 | 2NT | ♥6 | +3 | +2 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 3 | 3♦ | ♣J | +1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 21 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | -1 |
| +1.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 5 | 4♥ | ♠10 | = | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 12 | 3NT | ♥J | +2 | -11 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 20 | 3NT | ♣5 | +2 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 17 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -1 | +2 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 28 | 6♣ | ♣9 | +1 | -11 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 27 | 3♠ | ♣8 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.5 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 10 | 2♠ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 1 | 3NT | ♠A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.8 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 24 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 4 | 1NT | ♥Q | = | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 18 | 4♣ | ♥A | -2 | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 9 | 3NT | ♦8 | -2 | -7 |
| -4.0 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 16 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -5.5 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 7 | 3♥ | ♥6 | -2 | -7 |
| -5.7 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 6 | 4♠ | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| -6.1 | Round of 64 | JT BICEPS | 25 | 5♥ | ♦2 | = | -1 |