ZHU Ping · CFSC
vs par split: bidding -2.79 · play -0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.13/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.13/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 83.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 50.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 0.0% (1) | 100.0% (5) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -9.00 (1) · a suit -3.08 (13)
vs par by level: part-score -2.67 (6) · game -1.17 (6) · slam -13.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.24/bd (-2.00 vs par · 8) · defending -3.25/bd (-5.50 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.19/bd (-4.57 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.33/bd (-2.43 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 32 | K.Jin | J.Shih – P.Wang | Closed | 14 | -17.6 | -1.26 | -3.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.6 | Round of 32 | YBM | 9 | 5♣x | ♥8 | = | +6 |
| +2.8 | Round of 32 | YBM | 14 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +2 | -1 |
| +1.9 | Round of 32 | YBM | 8 | 2♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +1 |
| +1.6 | Round of 32 | YBM | 13 | 2♥ | ♠A | +2 | -1 |
| +1.2 | Round of 32 | YBM | 6 | 3♥ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 32 | YBM | 5 | 4♠ | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 32 | YBM | 12 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round of 32 | YBM | 4 | 6♠ | ♦J | +1 | -13 |
| -3.8 | Round of 32 | YBM | 2 | 3♥ | ♦5 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.8 | Round of 32 | YBM | 10 | 2♥ | ♦7 | = | -6 |
| -4.7 | Round of 32 | YBM | 11 | 4♥ | ♦K | = | -3 |
| -5.5 | Round of 32 | YBM | 7 | 2♠ | ♥K | -3 | -5 |
| -6.3 | Round of 32 | YBM | 1 | 3NT | ♦K | -1 | -9 |
| -9.1 | Round of 32 | YBM | 3 | 6♠x | ♣7 | = | -13 |