KING Victor · MCCALLUM
vs par split: bidding +0.00 · play -0.14
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.08/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.52/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 90.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | · | 66.7% (3) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +4.50 (4) · a suit -2.00 (10)
vs par by level: part-score +1.00 (8) · game -1.67 (6)
By role: declaring -4.72/bd (-7.50 vs par · 4) · defending -0.34/bd (+2.80 vs par · 10)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.70/bd (+2.29 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -2.49/bd (-2.57 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | S.Gabay | W.Wang – Y.Liu | Open | 14 | -22.3 | -1.59 | -0.14 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.6 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 13 | 3♥ | ♦8 | -1 | +12 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 9 | 3NT | ♥J | -1 | +5 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 12 | 3NT | ♥J | +1 | +11 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 2 | 2♥ | ♥4 | +2 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 3 | 3♦ | ♠5 | = | +1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 1 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 5 | 4♠ | ♦7 | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 14 | 2♥ | ♠7 | -2 | +1 |
| -1.8 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 7 | 1♥ | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 11 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | -3 |
| -2.5 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 4 | 1NT | ♠K | +1 | +0 |
| -4.9 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 10 | 3♦ | ♣Q | -2 | -7 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 6 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | -10 |
| -6.7 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 8 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -1 | -14 |