ROSENTHAL Andrew · ROSENTHAL
vs par split: bidding +0.60 · play +0.21
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.01/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.77/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 73.3% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 88.9%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 33.3% (3) | 83.3% (12) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (4) |
| Defence | 85.7% (7) | 90.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 66.7% (9) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 75.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +1.78 (9) · a suit +0.55 (33)
vs par by level: part-score +0.38 (21) · game +0.22 (18) · slam +7.33 (3)
By role: declaring +0.86/bd (-0.13 vs par · 15) · defending +0.74/bd (+1.33 vs par · 27)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.49/bd (+0.81 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +1.09/bd (+0.81 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | M.Zur-Campanile | P.Soulet – V.Reess | Open | 14 | +5.0 | +0.36 | +1.21 |
| Round of 32 | M.Zur-Campanile | M.Michielsen – Z.Mahmood | Open | 14 | +26.7 | +1.91 | +0.21 |
| Round of 16 | M.Zur-Campanile | S.Shan – L.Gan | Open | 14 | +1.3 | +0.09 | +1.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 14 | 6♥ | ♥10 | -2 | +11 |
| +10.7 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 4 | 7♠ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| +10.0 | Round of 64 | REESS | 8 | 4♣x | ♣3 | -4 | -3 |
| +9.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 3 | 6♠ | ♥A | -1 | +11 |
| +5.5 | Round of 64 | REESS | 7 | 3♠ | ♠J | -2 | +7 |
| +5.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 6 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +4.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 4 | 3NT | ♦4 | = | -1 |
| +3.7 | Round of 64 | REESS | 4 | 1NT | ♥Q | +1 | +6 |
| +3.6 | Round of 64 | REESS | 14 | 2♠ | ♥4 | -2 | +6 |
| +3.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 3 | 3♥ | ♠6 | = | +6 |
| +1.9 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 8 | 2♥ | ♦7 | +1 | +1 |
| +1.7 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 1 | 1NTx | ♥3 | -1 | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 7 | 4♥ | ♣6 | -1 | +6 |
| +1.4 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 5 | 4♠ | ♠2 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.3 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 10 | 3NT | ♦Q | -1 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 2 | 3♥ | ♠6 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | REESS | 6 | 1♥x | ♥3 | -1 | -6 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | REESS | 9 | 5♣ | ♦5 | -1 | +5 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | REESS | 12 | 3NT | ♥J | +1 | +11 |
| +0.7 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 13 | 3♣ | ♦4 | -2 | -2 |
| +0.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 5 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 12 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 8 | 3♦ | ♠K | -2 | +5 |
| -0.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 12 | 4♠ | ♣10 | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 7 | 2♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 9 | 2NT | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | REESS | 3 | 3♦ | ♣J | = | +1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | REESS | 1 | 1NT | ♠A | = | +2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | REESS | 5 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | REESS | 2 | 2NT | ♥7 | +3 | -2 |
| -1.7 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 6 | 3♣ | ♥Q | -1 | -3 |
| -1.9 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 13 | 2♥ | ♦6 | +3 | -2 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 11 | 5♦x | ♦9 | -2 | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 2 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -1 | +1 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | REESS | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | -3 |
| -2.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 10 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | -1 |
| -2.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 14 | 3NT | ♦3 | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 9 | 4♠ | ♣3 | -2 | -9 |
| -3.9 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 1 | 2♠ | ♦2 | +1 | -7 |
| -4.9 | Round of 64 | REESS | 10 | 3♠ | ♣Q | -2 | -7 |
| -5.7 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 11 | 4♥ | ♥4 | = | -8 |
| -8.2 | Round of 64 | REESS | 13 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | -1 |