FRUSCOLONI Leonardo · ROMAMIAMI
vs par split: bidding +0.50 · play +0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.17/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.08/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 60.0% · declarer play 0.0% · defence 88.9%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 66.7% (3) |
| Declarer play | · | 0.0% (1) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 85.7% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +5.75 (4) · a suit -0.60 (10)
vs par by level: part-score +1.71 (7) · game +0.71 (7)
By role: declaring +0.04/bd (-2.20 vs par · 5) · defending +0.37/bd (+3.11 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.36/bd (+4.29 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -0.86/bd (-1.86 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | C.Alpert | Y.Peng – P.Lu | Open | 14 | +3.5 | +0.25 | +1.21 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.6 | Round of 64 | YBM | 13 | 4♥ | ♥3 | -1 | +12 |
| +3.7 | Round of 64 | YBM | 4 | 1NT | ♥K | +1 | +6 |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 7 | 2NT | ♦5 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.9 | Round of 64 | YBM | 8 | 5♦ | ♣A | = | -11 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | YBM | 2 | 3♣ | ♥6 | = | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | YBM | 9 | 5♣ | ♦2 | -1 | +5 |
| -0.0 | Round of 64 | YBM | 14 | 2♣ | ♦A | -1 | +3 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 12 | 3NT | ♣6 | +2 | +11 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | YBM | 3 | 1NT | ♠A | -2 | +1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | YBM | 1 | 2♦ | ♠A | = | +2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | YBM | 5 | 4♥ | ♠5 | = | +1 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | YBM | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | -3 |
| -2.6 | Round of 64 | YBM | 10 | 2♥ | ♦7 | = | -6 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | YBM | 6 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | -10 |