ZACK Yaniv · EMERALD
vs par split: bidding -0.29 · play -0.12
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.18/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.29/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 72.7% · defence 92.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (9) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 83.3% (6) | 95.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (4) · ♥ 100.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -2.27 (11) · a suit +0.26 (31)
vs par by level: part-score -0.21 (19) · game -0.62 (21) · slam +0.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.46/bd (-2.69 vs par · 16) · defending -1.04/bd (+1.00 vs par · 26)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.00/bd (-0.05 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.94/bd (-0.76 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | I.Cohen | N.L'Ecuyer – P.Street | Open | 14 | -14.2 | -1.01 | -0.21 |
| Round of 64 | M.Barel | T.Forrester – C.Lorenzini | Open | 14 | -2.8 | -0.20 | +0.07 |
| Round of 64 | I.Cohen | T.Forrester – C.Lorenzini | Open | 14 | -2.7 | -0.19 | -1.07 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 8 | 6♦ | ♦9 | = | -11 |
| +3.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 36 | 3♣ | ♥K | -3 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 51 | 4♠ | ♠6 | = | +3 |
| +3.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 35 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -1 | -1 |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 32 | 4♥ | ♦5 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 48 | 3NT | ♠10 | +3 | -12 |
| +2.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 50 | 3♥ | ♠5 | -1 | -2 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 1 | 1NT | ♠5 | +1 | +6 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 34 | 6♠ | ♦6 | -2 | +11 |
| +2.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 13 | 3♠ | ♥K | +2 | -9 |
| +1.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 37 | 4♥ | ♠7 | -1 | +4 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 3 | 2♥ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 49 | 3NT | ♠A | -1 | -8 |
| +0.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 56 | 3NT | ♣J | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 52 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 47 | 1♠ | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 9 | 3NT | ♠J | +2 | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 38 | 4♥ | ♣J | +1 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 14 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 30 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 2 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | +2 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 5 | 2♠ | ♦K | -1 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 41 | 2♠ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 45 | 1NT | ♥Q | +1 | +1 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 44 | 4♥ | ♣Q | = | +3 |
| -0.6 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 46 | 2♦ | ♠9 | = | +2 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 42 | 2NT | ♥9 | = | +1 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 11 | 2♥ | ♣3 | = | +1 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 40 | 4♠ | ♠3 | +2 | -11 |
| -1.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 55 | 3♥ | ♦K | +1 | +6 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 53 | 3NT | ♥9 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 6 | 3♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 10 | 4♥ | ♠9 | +2 | +12 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 33 | 3♣ | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 39 | 2♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 4 | 1NT | ♦Q | -1 | -6 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 54 | 4♠ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| -4.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 29 | 4♠x | ♥K | = | -5 |
| -5.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 31 | 3♦ | ♦6 | +1 | -10 |
| -7.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 7 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| -9.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 43 | 3NT | ♠A | = | -7 |
| -9.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 12 | 5♦ | ♠7 | = | +0 |