GRUDE Tor Eivind · GILLIS
vs par split: bidding +1.74 · play -0.56
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.13/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.91/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 53.3% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 57.1% (7) | 50.0% (8) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -3.22 (9) · a suit +2.58 (19)
vs par by level: part-score +1.50 (14) · game -0.17 (12) · slam +0.50 (2)
By role: declaring -1.55/bd (-0.65 vs par · 20) · defending +0.25/bd (+4.12 vs par · 8)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.89/bd (+1.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -1.19/bd (+0.29 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | C.Bakke | N.Bocchi – A.Sementa | Open | 14 | -27.1 | -1.94 | -0.14 |
| Round of 64 | C.Bakke | D.Bilde – G.Duboin | Open | 14 | -1.9 | -0.14 | +1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.6 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 24 | 2♠x | ♦5 | -3 | +9 |
| +6.0 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 23 | 6♦ | ♦5 | -1 | +13 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 21 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -2 | +9 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 1 | 1NT | ♠2 | = | +6 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 3 | 2♥ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 22 | 3NT | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 12 | 3♠ | ♣K | -2 | +11 |
| +1.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 13 | 2♠ | ♠7 | +2 | -10 |
| +1.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 26 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 19 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 27 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 18 | 1NT | ♣5 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 14 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 2 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | +2 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 5 | 2♠ | ♦K | -1 | +1 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 16 | 4♥ | ♦5 | = | +11 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 25 | 3♥ | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| -1.3 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 6 | 3♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 28 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | -10 |
| -1.6 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 9 | 3NT | ♠J | = | -1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 11 | 2♠ | ♦7 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.4 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 15 | 3NT | ♠K | -2 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 4 | 1NT | ♦3 | -1 | -6 |
| -4.1 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 20 | 2♠ | ♥5 | -3 | -4 |
| -4.2 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 10 | 4♠x | ♦K | -3 | +12 |
| -7.9 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 7 | 3NT | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| -12.2 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 8 | 4NT | ♠10 | -2 | -17 |
| -12.4 | Round of 64 | LAVAZZA | 17 | 6♦x | ♦5 | -4 | -12 |