GRUBISIC Mia · CROATIA U16
vs par split: bidding -0.09 · play -0.66
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.26/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.80/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 60.0% #74 of 78 · declarer play 0.0% #78 of 78 · defence 88.2% #18 of 78
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 60.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | · | 0.0% (3) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 91.7% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -1.89 (9) · a suit -0.30 (23)
vs par by level: part-score -1.29 (14) · game -1.00 (17) · slam +11.00 (1)
By role: declaring -2.98/bd (-4.73 vs par · 15) · defending -0.27/bd (+2.77 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.83/bd (-0.25 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -2.24/bd (-1.25 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | V.Cizel | F.Yu – N.Lang | Closed | 8 | -10.6 | -1.32 | +2.12 |
| Round 3 | V.Cizel | BHATT ANSHUL – P.Mayur | Closed | 8 | -8.4 | -1.05 | -1.25 |
| Round 6 | V.Cizel | R.Sun – J.Xia | Closed | 8 | -8.2 | -1.02 | -1.62 |
| Round 7 | V.Cizel | A.Shang – Y.Liao | Closed | 8 | -22.0 | -2.75 | -2.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.4 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 13 | 3NT | ♥A | -3 | +14 |
| +9.0 | Round 3 | INDIA | 17 | 6♥ | ♠8 | -1 | +11 |
| +7.6 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 16 | 3NT | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| +5.9 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 14 | 4♥ | ♣2 | -2 | +11 |
| +4.0 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 9 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +3 | +6 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | INDIA | 19 | 4♠ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 19 | 3NT | ♦4 | -1 | -5 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | INDIA | 21 | 3♥ | ♠J | -2 | +2 |
| +0.6 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 15 | 4♥ | ♦3 | = | -1 |
| +0.4 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 9 | 4♠ | ♥2 | = | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 24 | 4♦ | ♠A | -2 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 23 | 2♥ | ♣7 | = | +1 |
| -0.8 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 10 | 2NT | ♠6 | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 22 | 3NT | ♦2 | +3 | +11 |
| -1.2 | Round 3 | INDIA | 24 | 1♠ | ♠6 | -2 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 3 | INDIA | 22 | 2♠ | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 11 | 4♥ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 14 | 3♣ | ♣5 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 15 | 3♦ | ♣4 | = | +1 |
| -2.5 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 18 | 4♠ | ♣4 | -1 | -1 |
| -3.3 | Round 3 | INDIA | 23 | 2♠ | ♦7 | = | +1 |
| -4.2 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 10 | 5♦ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -4.2 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 16 | 4♥ | ♣7 | -3 | +3 |
| -4.3 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 17 | 3♥ | ♠5 | -3 | -6 |
| -4.9 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 11 | 2♦ | ♠4 | -1 | -5 |
| -6.8 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 20 | 3♣ | ♥K | +1 | -11 |
| -6.9 | Round 3 | INDIA | 18 | 3NT | ♥10 | +2 | -14 |
| -7.8 | Round 3 | INDIA | 20 | 3NT | ♦Q | +1 | -10 |
| -7.9 | Round 7 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 21 | 3♠ | ♥K | -3 | -7 |
| -8.1 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 12 | 4♥ | ♠2 | -2 | -11 |
| -8.5 | Round 2 | SXMARS | 12 | 3NT | ♦K | +2 | +0 |
| -12.5 | Round 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 13 | 3NT | ♦K | -1 | -13 |