Opatija 2019 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Butler vs double-dummy par↑ top

IMPs per board scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s minimax par — what real bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect double-dummy play. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoards/boardTotal
1Z.GaoSXMARS86+1.91+164.0
2N.LangSXMARS130+0.70+91.0
3X.ZhangSXSATURN102+0.52+53.0
4Z.LuSXSATURN102+0.51+52.0
5Z.XieSXVENUS116+0.41+48.0
6S.LiSXSATURN130+0.40+52.0
7K.KuflowskiPOLAND114+0.39+44.0
8F.KurlitPOLAND114+0.39+44.0
9J.YangSXVENUS72+0.36+26.0
10F.YuSXMARS116+0.22+25.0
11Y.FuSXMARS130+0.18+23.0
12L.KasperczykPOLAND74+0.12+9.0
13M.StasikPOLAND74+0.12+9.0
14T.TangSXSATURN86+0.06+5.0
15H.ShenSXMARS86-0.14-12.0
16L.CiborowskaPOLAND100-0.34-34.0
17K.CiborowskiPOLAND100-0.34-34.0
18Y.WuSXSATURN72-0.43-31.0
19F.LinSXVENUS116-0.44-51.0
20H.JiangSXVENUS72-0.62-45.0
21S.MaSXVENUS72-0.75-54.0
22J.WangSXVENUS72-0.89-64.0
23Z.ChangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT16+1.25+20.0
24Z.SunRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT16+1.25+20.0
25M.RochesEYE OF THE TIGER32+1.16+37.0
26P.TchoulkineEYE OF THE TIGER32+1.16+37.0
27J.BakhshiSHARKS32+1.00+32.0
28M.BertheauSHARKS32+1.00+32.0
29Z.TianSXSATURN28-0.04-1.0
30Y.JiangSHSLLS132-0.25-8.0
31N.XuSHSLLS132-0.25-8.0
32X.LinRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT16-0.69-11.0
33Z.WangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT16-0.69-11.0
34C.BensEYE OF THE TIGER32-0.78-25.0
35L.BoninEYE OF THE TIGER32-0.78-25.0
36M.XuSHSLLS132-1.03-33.0
37S.YangSHSLLS132-1.03-33.0
38A.BrogelandSHARKS32-1.62-52.0
39A.LandsvikSHARKS32-1.62-52.0
40Z.WangSXMARS28-2.25-63.0
41J.HuangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT32-2.75-88.0
42Z.ZhuoRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT32-2.75-88.0

Opening-lead accuracy↑ top

How often a player’s opening lead held declarer to the same tricks as the best defensive lead double-dummy. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamLeadsOn targetConceded
1F.KurlitPOLAND2495.8%0.04
2T.TangSXSATURN1994.7%0.05
3S.LiSXSATURN3190.3%0.10
4H.ShenSXMARS1989.5%0.10
5J.WangSXVENUS1989.5%0.10
6Z.LuSXSATURN2889.3%0.11
7J.YangSXVENUS1586.7%0.27
8Y.FuSXMARS2986.2%0.14
9F.LinSXVENUS2785.2%0.15
10Z.GaoSXMARS2281.8%0.18
11Z.XieSXVENUS3080.0%0.20
12M.StasikPOLAND2080.0%0.20
13K.KuflowskiPOLAND2378.3%0.26
14K.CiborowskiPOLAND3278.1%0.22
15X.ZhangSXSATURN2277.3%0.27
16N.LangSXMARS2975.9%0.24
17F.YuSXMARS3871.1%0.34
18L.CiborowskaPOLAND3070.0%0.33
19S.MaSXVENUS1369.2%0.39
20H.JiangSXVENUS1668.8%0.31
21L.KasperczykPOLAND2065.0%0.40
22Y.WuSXSATURN1258.3%0.42
23M.RochesEYE OF THE TIGER1100.0%0.00
24M.BertheauSHARKS10100.0%0.00
25Z.ChangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT4100.0%0.00
26Y.JiangSHSLLS17100.0%0.00
27J.HuangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT6100.0%0.00
28Z.ZhuoRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT6100.0%0.00
29Z.TianSXSATURN1090.0%0.10
30N.XuSHSLLS1988.9%0.11
31P.TchoulkineEYE OF THE TIGER1687.5%0.19
32Z.SunRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT683.3%0.17
33X.LinRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT580.0%0.20
34A.BrogelandSHARKS1080.0%0.30
35A.LandsvikSHARKS875.0%0.25
36L.BoninEYE OF THE TIGER875.0%0.25
37Z.WangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT875.0%0.38
38C.BensEYE OF THE TIGER1172.7%0.27
39Z.WangSXMARS771.4%0.29
40M.XuSHSLLS11060.0%0.40
41J.BakhshiSHARKS850.0%0.88
42S.YangSHSLLS1616.7%1.33

Declarer-play accuracy↑ top

How often declarer took at least the double-dummy makeable tricks after the actual opening lead — i.e. didn’t leave tricks on the table. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamContractsOn targetConceded
1J.WangSXVENUS2286.4%0.18
2K.KuflowskiPOLAND3582.9%0.29
3N.LangSXMARS2982.8%0.28
4M.StasikPOLAND2580.0%0.24
5H.JiangSXVENUS1080.0%0.30
6L.KasperczykPOLAND977.8%0.22
7H.ShenSXMARS2777.8%0.26
8Y.FuSXMARS3577.1%0.26
9Y.WuSXSATURN1776.5%0.23
10T.TangSXSATURN2373.9%0.39
11Z.GaoSXMARS1973.7%0.37
12X.ZhangSXSATURN3372.7%0.42
13K.CiborowskiPOLAND1872.2%0.28
14S.MaSXVENUS2572.0%0.32
15F.KurlitPOLAND3171.0%0.35
16Z.LuSXSATURN3171.0%0.42
17F.YuSXMARS2669.2%0.31
18F.LinSXVENUS3969.2%0.36
19Z.XieSXVENUS2969.0%0.38
20S.LiSXSATURN3262.5%0.44
21J.YangSXVENUS1560.0%0.40
22L.CiborowskaPOLAND2060.0%0.50
23M.RochesEYE OF THE TIGER4100.0%0.00
24Z.SunRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT3100.0%0.00
25Z.TianSXSATURN1100.0%0.00
26Z.WangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1100.0%0.00
27J.HuangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1392.3%0.15
28J.BakhshiSHARKS785.7%0.14
29M.BertheauSHARKS785.7%0.14
30M.XuSHSLLS1785.7%0.14
31Z.ZhuoRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT683.3%0.33
32P.TchoulkineEYE OF THE TIGER1181.8%0.18
33C.BensEYE OF THE TIGER580.0%0.20
34Y.JiangSHSLLS1580.0%0.20
35A.LandsvikSHARKS875.0%0.25
36L.BoninEYE OF THE TIGER771.4%0.29
37A.BrogelandSHARKS666.7%0.33
38Z.ChangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT366.7%0.33
39S.YangSHSLLS1966.7%0.33
40N.XuSHSLLS11163.6%0.55
41Z.WangSXMARS862.5%0.50
42X.LinRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT250.0%0.50

Defensive accuracy↑ top

How often the defenders held declarer to the double-dummy makeable (or fewer) — charged to both defenders on the board. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOn targetConceded
1Z.LuSXSATURN4490.9%0.14
2T.TangSXSATURN3889.5%0.10
3Y.WuSXSATURN3688.9%0.17
4N.LangSXMARS7286.1%0.14
5H.ShenSXMARS3585.7%0.17
6L.KasperczykPOLAND4085.0%0.15
7M.StasikPOLAND4085.0%0.15
8F.YuSXMARS6183.6%0.16
9F.LinSXVENUS5182.4%0.20
10L.CiborowskaPOLAND6282.3%0.19
11K.CiborowskiPOLAND6282.3%0.19
12Z.GaoSXMARS4881.2%0.19
13S.LiSXSATURN6381.0%0.27
14K.KuflowskiPOLAND4780.9%0.23
15F.KurlitPOLAND4780.9%0.23
16Z.XieSXVENUS5780.7%0.23
17J.WangSXVENUS3580.0%0.20
18S.MaSXVENUS2479.2%0.25
19X.ZhangSXSATURN4278.6%0.31
20H.JiangSXVENUS3778.4%0.27
21J.YangSXVENUS3677.8%0.28
22Y.FuSXMARS5676.8%0.25
23J.BakhshiSHARKS18100.0%0.00
24M.BertheauSHARKS18100.0%0.00
25M.RochesEYE OF THE TIGER1788.2%0.18
26P.TchoulkineEYE OF THE TIGER1788.2%0.18
27Y.JiangSHSLLS11687.5%0.12
28N.XuSHSLLS11687.5%0.12
29Z.TianSXSATURN2185.7%0.19
30J.HuangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1275.0%0.25
31Z.ZhuoRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1275.0%0.25
32M.XuSHSLLS11675.0%0.38
33S.YangSHSLLS11675.0%0.38
34C.BensEYE OF THE TIGER1973.7%0.32
35L.BoninEYE OF THE TIGER1973.7%0.32
36A.BrogelandSHARKS1872.2%0.33
37A.LandsvikSHARKS1872.2%0.33
38Z.ChangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1070.0%0.40
39Z.SunRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1070.0%0.40
40Z.WangSXMARS1668.8%0.31
41X.LinRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1361.5%0.39
42Z.WangRDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT1361.5%0.39

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOpp /bdRaw /bdAdj /bdΔ
1Z.GaoSXMARS86-0.18+1.22+1.04·
2L.CiborowskaPOLAND100+0.49+0.32+0.81▲7
3K.CiborowskiPOLAND100+0.49+0.32+0.81▲7
4Y.FuSXMARS130-0.14+0.88+0.74▼2
5H.ShenSXMARS86-0.12+0.77+0.64▼2
6K.KuflowskiPOLAND114+0.22+0.25+0.47▲6
7F.KurlitPOLAND114+0.22+0.25+0.47▲6
8N.LangSXMARS130-0.14+0.48+0.34▼2
9T.TangSXSATURN86-0.29+0.54+0.25▼4
10X.ZhangSXSATURN102-0.50+0.67+0.18▼6
11F.YuSXMARS116-0.20+0.32+0.12·
12L.KasperczykPOLAND74+0.46-0.38+0.08▲5
13M.StasikPOLAND74+0.46-0.38+0.08▲5
14F.LinSXVENUS116+0.09-0.13-0.04▲1
15S.LiSXSATURN130-0.39+0.33-0.06▼7
16H.JiangSXVENUS72+0.26-0.50-0.24▲4
17Z.LuSXSATURN102-0.66+0.42-0.24▼10
18Z.XieSXVENUS116-0.06-0.19-0.25▼2
19S.MaSXVENUS72+0.05-0.42-0.38·
20J.WangSXVENUS72+0.07-0.57-0.49▲1
21J.YangSXVENUS72-0.01-0.59-0.60▲1
22Y.WuSXSATURN72-0.65-0.06-0.71▼8