Round 29 — BAM Kids Qualifier
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 29 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHENGXING YELLOW | GERMANY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHILE | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NORWAY U16 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | SHENGXING GREEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING MERCURY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SHENGXING MARS | CHINA SHJS 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ITALY | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINA RDFZ RED | SHENGXING RED | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | INDIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA SHJS 1 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | SHENGXING JUPITER | POLAND | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 29↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 29 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R29 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | 131.80 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 2 | 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 124.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 3 | SHENGXING MARS | 122.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 4 | 🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 | 121.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 5 | SHENGXING MERCURY | 118.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 6 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ RED | 116.00 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 6 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 116.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 8 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 108.00 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 9 | 🇮🇹 ITALY | 107.20 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 10 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 106.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 10 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY | 106.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 12 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 | 105.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 | 104.00 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 | 104.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 15 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 103.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 15 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 103.00 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 17 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 102.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 18 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 101.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 19 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 100.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 19 | SHENGXING RED | 100.00 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 21 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 89.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 21 | SHENGXING GREEN | 89.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 23 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 81.00 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 24 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 78.00 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 25 | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 75.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 26 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 74.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 29 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R29 | BAM% |
|---|
SHENGXING YELLOW vs GERMANY 4 : 0 VP (match 55663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING YELLOW | GERMANY | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2NT | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2NT | E | ♦6 | = | 120 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇱 CHILE vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 0 : 4 VP (match 55664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇱 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ BLUE vs AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES 2 : 2 VP (match 55665) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | |
| 7 | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 58% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥3 | -3 | 150 | 100% | 3NT | S | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY U16 vs TJ BRIDGE 1 4 : 0 VP (match 55666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY U16 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | |
| 7 | 3♥ | E | ♦J | +1 | 170 | 58% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2NT | W | ♣J | +1 | 150 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAGIC EYES THAILAND vs SHENGXING GREEN 4 : 0 VP (match 55667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | SHENGXING GREEN | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2NT | W | ♥3 | = | 120 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | = | 120 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA SHJS 3 vs SHENGXING MERCURY 0 : 4 VP (match 55668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING MERCURY | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 3NT | E | ♠8 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING MARS vs CHINA SHJS 2 0 : 4 VP (match 55669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING MARS | CHINA SHJS 2 | |
| 7 | 2♥ | W | ♦5 | +1 | 140 | 52% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 400 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇮🇹 ITALY vs 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS 2 : 2 VP (match 55670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALY | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♣2 | = | 400 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 | 🇹🇼 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TJ BRIDGE 2 vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 2 : 2 VP (match 55671) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TJ BRIDGE 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ RED vs SHENGXING RED 3 : 1 VP (match 55672) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ RED | SHENGXING RED | |
| 7 | 3♣ | S | ♥K | = | 110 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 400 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 400 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW vs 🇮🇳 INDIA 0 : 4 VP (match 55673) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | INDIA | |
| 7 | 2♥ | E | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 4♥ | E | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♦ | S | ♠7 | = | 90 | 64% | 3NT | W | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇮🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 1 : 3 VP (match 55674) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 1 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 620 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 400 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING JUPITER vs POLAND 1 : 3 VP (match 55675) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING JUPITER | POLAND | |
| 7 | 2♥ | E | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♠8 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♣J | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|