Round 22 — BAM Kids Qualifier
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 22 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALY | GERMANY | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | CHINA SHJS 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA SHJS 3 | CHINA RDFZ RED | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIA | SHENGXING GREEN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NORWAY U16 | CHINA SHJS 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | POLAND | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CHILE | SHENGXING JUPITER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SHENGXING RED | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | SHENGXING MERCURY | SHENGXING MARS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 22↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 22 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R22 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHENGXING MARS | 111.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 2 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | 109.80 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 3 | 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 106.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 4 | 🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 | 102.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 5 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ RED | 100.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 5 | SHENGXING MERCURY | 100.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 7 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 96.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 8 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 95.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 9 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 93.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 10 | 🇮🇹 ITALY | 92.20 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 11 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 | 91.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 11 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 | 91.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 90.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 | 90.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 13 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY | 90.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 13 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 90.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 17 | SHENGXING RED | 88.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 18 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 87.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 19 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 86.80 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 20 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 83.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 21 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 82.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 21 | SHENGXING GREEN | 82.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 23 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 72.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 24 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 67.80 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 25 | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 64.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 26 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 62.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 22 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R22 | BAM% |
|---|
🇮🇹 ITALY vs 🇩🇪 GERMANY 3 : 1 VP (match 54503) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALY | GERMANY | |
| 11 | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 6NT | S | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3NT | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 | 🇩🇪 | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 2 : 2 VP (match 54504) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | CHINA SHJS 2 | |
| 11 | 3♦ | N | ♠9 | +3 | 170 | 74% | 4♦ | N | ♠9 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 11 | 3♦ | N | +3 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | N | +2 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ RED 0 : 4 VP (match 54505) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 3 | CHINA RDFZ RED | |
| 11 | 6NT | S | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 4NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | = | 620 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | S | +2 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA vs SHENGXING GREEN 0 : 4 VP (match 54506) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA | SHENGXING GREEN | |
| 11 | 3NT | S | ♥2 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 6NT | N | ♠5 | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | N | ♦4 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | N | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 2 : 2 VP (match 54507) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY U16 | CHINA SHJS 1 | |
| 11 | 6NT | N | ♠9 | = | 990 | 88% | 4NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3NT | N | ♦3 | = | 600 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | S | +2 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES 1 : 3 VP (match 54508) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠9 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 6NT | S | ♠5 | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs SHENGXING JUPITER 0 : 4 VP (match 54509) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | SHENGXING JUPITER | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠5 | +2 | 460 | 62% | 6NT | S | ♠2 | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | S | ♦6 | +1 | 170 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | = | 620 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 vs SHENGXING YELLOW 1 : 3 VP (match 54510) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | SHENGXING YELLOW | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♣9 | +2 | 460 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♣5 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW 4 : 0 VP (match 54511) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | |
| 11 | 6NT | S | ♠5 | = | 990 | 88% | 6NT | N | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 170 | 82% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | S | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING RED vs CHINA RDFZ BLUE 0 : 4 VP (match 54512) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING RED | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | |
| 11 | 5NTx | N | ♣4 | = | 670 | 72% | 6NT | S | ♦9 | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2NT | N | ♦8 | = | 120 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 5NTx | N | = | 670 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TJ BRIDGE 1 vs TJ BRIDGE 2 1 : 3 VP (match 54513) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TJ BRIDGE 1 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | |
| 11 | 6NT | S | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3NT | S | ♦9 | +1 | 430 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 68% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS vs MAGIC EYES THAILAND 1 : 3 VP (match 54514) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | |
| 11 | 6NT | S | ♦9 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 6NT | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | S | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 140 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING MERCURY vs SHENGXING MARS 2 : 2 VP (match 54515) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING MERCURY | SHENGXING MARS | |
| 11 | 6NT | S | ♣4 | = | 990 | 88% | 3NT | N | ♠9 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3NT | N | ♥8 | = | 600 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | S | = | 990 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|