| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 32 | 96 | 1715.85 | 48.37% | 7 | 13 |
| Semifinal B | 1 | 94 | 1505.51 | 59.37% | 12 | 4 |
| Final | 9 | 51 | 415.00 | 50.86% | 3 | 3 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 199.42 | 51.93% | 1 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 162.00 | 42.19% | 1 | 4 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 114.00 | 29.69% | 0 | 5 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 440.43 | 55.05% | 1 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 456.16 | 57.02% | 3 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 343.84 | 42.98% | 1 | 2 |
| Semifinal B · session 1 | 14 | 252.73 | 64.47% | 2 | 0 |
| Semifinal B · session 2 | 16 | 207.91 | 46.41% | 0 | 2 |
| Semifinal B · session 3 | 16 | 270.06 | 60.28% | 2 | 0 |
| Semifinal B · session 4 | 16 | 267.69 | 64.35% | 2 | 0 |
| Semifinal B · session 5 | 16 | 253.62 | 60.97% | 3 | 1 |
| Semifinal B · session 6 | 16 | 253.50 | 60.94% | 3 | 1 |
| Final · session 1 | 15 | 108.00 | 45.00% | 1 | 1 |
| Final · session 2 | 15 | 129.00 | 53.75% | 2 | 1 |
| Final · session 3 | 21 | 178.00 | 52.98% | 0 | 1 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +2.43% | 235 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱WARWOCKI Lech | 76.8% | 56 | 75.0% | 60 | 86.5% | 126 |
| 🇵🇱NEDZI Tadeusz | 85.7% | 70 | 68.1% | 47 | 86.5% | 126 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.