CIMR Robert · RUSZKIEWICZ
vs par split: bidding -0.48 · play -0.24
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.18/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 92.9% · declarer play 71.4% · defence 91.7%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 27.8% (30/108)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 90.9% (11) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 66.7% (6) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 89.5% (19) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (4) · ♥ 75.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -1.56 (9) · a suit -0.48 (33)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (15) · game -1.15 (26) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.23/bd (-2.06 vs par · 18) · defending -0.05/bd (+0.29 vs par · 24)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.24/bd (-0.57 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.01/bd (-0.86 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 | S.Adamczyk | T.Latos – M.Giza | Closed | 14 | -5.3 | -0.38 | -0.64 |
| Round 7 | S.Adamczyk | A.De Mel – K.Ramaratnam | Closed | 14 | -9.7 | -0.69 | -0.79 |
| Round 8 | S.Adamczyk | D.Jansons – K.Szewczyk | Closed | 14 | +9.7 | +0.69 | -0.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.5 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 19 | 4♥x | ♠5 | -3 | +12 |
| +5.7 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 7 | 4♥ | ♠T | = | -1 |
| +5.0 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 15 | 4♠ | ♥K | -2 | +5 |
| +4.3 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 26 | 3♣ | ♠7 | +1 | +10 |
| +3.7 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 20 | 2♥ | ♠A | -3 | +5 |
| +3.7 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 21 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | +4 |
| +3.4 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 22 | 3NT | ♦9 | -2 | +3 |
| +3.1 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 4 | 3♣ | ♦K | -2 | -7 |
| +2.7 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 13 | 2♥ | ♣A | +2 | -1 |
| +2.5 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 25 | 1NT | ♠7 | +2 | +1 |
| +2.3 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 25 | 2♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 28 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +1 |
| +1.8 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 20 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | -1 |
| +1.4 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 16 | 3NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 14 | 4♠x | ♦5 | -2 | +4 |
| +1.0 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 24 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 27 | 4♣ | ♥7 | = | -5 |
| +0.7 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 19 | 1♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.7 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 5 | 2♣ | ♥5 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.2 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 1 | 4♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 16 | 5♣x | ♥A | -2 | -10 |
| +0.2 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 23 | 2♠ | ♣J | +2 | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 2 | 5♦ | ♥J | = | +11 |
| -0.4 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 12 | 4♠x | ♣K | -3 | -4 |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 27 | 3NT | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 3 | 4♠ | ♣4 | -1 | +2 |
| -1.8 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 15 | 3NT | ♠J | +1 | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 22 | 4♠ | ♦T | = | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 8 | 3NT | ♥9 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.5 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 24 | 4♠ | ♦A | -1 | -10 |
| -2.5 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 26 | 3♠ | ♥A | -4 | -6 |
| -2.8 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 17 | 5♣ | ♥A | = | +2 |
| -3.1 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 11 | 5♣ | ♠3 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 17 | 4♥x | ♠8 | -2 | -11 |
| -3.1 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 18 | 1NT | ♠T | +1 | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 9 | 3♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -4.7 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 21 | 2♠ | ♥A | -2 | -3 |
| -4.8 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 18 | 5♥x | ♦8 | -3 | -14 |
| -5.3 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 6 | 2♥ | ♠J | -2 | -6 |
| -6.0 | Round 4 | TELEDIAGNOSIS | 23 | 3NT | ♥9 | -2 | -13 |
| -7.3 | Round 8 | YOUTH | 28 | 7♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -7.7 | Round 7 | OMEGA | 10 | 3NT | ♣J | +1 | +0 |