| Stage | Pair | # | Bds | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | πΈπͺABRAGI Andreas β π¨π¦OISHI Cindy | 57 | 96 | 51.77% | 13 | 12 |
| Semifinal A | πΈπͺABRAGI Andreas β π¨π¦OISHI Cindy | 62 | 96 | 47.54% | 8 | 19 |
| Opening leads | 70.3% | 37 leads, cost 0.297 |
| Declarer play | 81.4% | 59 contracts, cost 0.322 |
| Defence | 88.5% | 87 boards, cost 0.126 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.