Istanbul 2014 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Butler vs double-dummy par↑ top

IMPs per board scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s minimax par — what real bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect double-dummy play. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoards/boardTotal
1O.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN196+0.88+173.0
2J.Safsten🇸🇪 SWEDEN196+0.88+173.0
3B.Kristensen🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.31+61.0
4K.Rosenberg🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.31+61.0
5A.Boulin🇫🇷 FRANCE154+0.30+46.0
6C.Deheeger🇫🇷 FRANCE154+0.30+46.0
7J.Saether🇳🇴 NORWAY168+0.25+42.0
8M.Scheie🇳🇴 NORWAY168+0.25+42.0
9C.Bakke🇳🇴 NORWAY168-0.08-14.0
10E.Flaatt🇳🇴 NORWAY168-0.08-14.0
11C.Huber🇺🇸 USA 1196-0.14-28.0
12O.Kriegel🇺🇸 USA 1196-0.14-28.0
13F.Beugin🇫🇷 FRANCE84-0.29-24.0
14M.Fourre🇫🇷 FRANCE84-0.29-24.0
15I.Gronkvist🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.29-57.0
16M.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.29-57.0
17B.Marie🇫🇷 FRANCE98-0.72-71.0
18T.Vincenot🇫🇷 FRANCE98-0.72-71.0
19S.Chen🇨🇳 CHINA42+2.10+88.0
20Q.Wang🇨🇳 CHINA42+2.10+88.0
21B.Krawczyk🇵🇱 POLAND56+1.18+66.0
22M.Krysa🇵🇱 POLAND56+1.18+66.0
23L.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS42+1.12+47.0
24M.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS42+1.12+47.0
25F.Chan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG42+1.12+47.0
26M.Ng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG42+1.12+47.0
27T.Sprinkhuizen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS42-0.33-14.0
28L.Tijssen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS42-0.33-14.0
29S.Tseng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG28-0.71-20.0
30V.Wan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG28-0.71-20.0
31K.Jin🇨🇳 CHINA42-1.36-57.0
32C.Zhu🇨🇳 CHINA42-1.36-57.0
33L.Lee🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG42-1.55-65.0
34J.Tsang🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG42-1.55-65.0
35S.Gu🇨🇳 CHINA28-1.68-47.0
36B.Miao🇨🇳 CHINA28-1.68-47.0
37P.Marcinowski🇵🇱 POLAND56-1.73-97.0
38M.Sobczak🇵🇱 POLAND56-1.73-97.0
39P.Coppens🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS28-2.71-76.0
40B.Donkersloot🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS28-2.71-76.0

Opening-lead accuracy↑ top

How often a player’s opening lead held declarer to the same tricks as the best defensive lead double-dummy. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamLeadsOn targetConceded
1B.Marie🇫🇷 FRANCE2095.0%0.05
2O.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN4591.1%0.09
3B.Kristensen🇺🇸 USA 14490.9%0.11
4J.Safsten🇸🇪 SWEDEN6789.6%0.16
5I.Gronkvist🇸🇪 SWEDEN3789.2%0.11
6C.Deheeger🇫🇷 FRANCE3588.6%0.11
7M.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN3886.8%0.21
8F.Beugin🇫🇷 FRANCE1586.7%0.13
9K.Rosenberg🇺🇸 USA 14586.7%0.18
10M.Scheie🇳🇴 NORWAY4586.7%0.20
11C.Bakke🇳🇴 NORWAY3786.5%0.14
12M.Fourre🇫🇷 FRANCE2085.0%0.15
13C.Huber🇺🇸 USA 14085.0%0.17
14J.Saether🇳🇴 NORWAY4684.8%0.22
15T.Vincenot🇫🇷 FRANCE2684.6%0.27
16A.Boulin🇫🇷 FRANCE3180.6%0.29
17E.Flaatt🇳🇴 NORWAY4580.0%0.22
18O.Kriegel🇺🇸 USA 15974.6%0.41
19B.Miao🇨🇳 CHINA4100.0%0.00
20M.Sobczak🇵🇱 POLAND1392.3%0.23
21M.Ng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1291.7%0.08
22Q.Wang🇨🇳 CHINA1090.0%0.20
23S.Chen🇨🇳 CHINA1586.7%0.13
24L.Lee🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG785.7%0.29
25L.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS683.3%0.17
26P.Marcinowski🇵🇱 POLAND1283.3%0.17
27J.Tsang🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1181.8%0.18
28T.Sprinkhuizen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1080.0%0.20
29M.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1478.6%0.29
30L.Tijssen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS977.8%0.33
31K.Jin🇨🇳 CHINA977.8%0.44
32B.Krawczyk🇵🇱 POLAND1776.5%0.23
33S.Tseng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG475.0%0.25
34V.Wan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG771.4%0.29
35C.Zhu🇨🇳 CHINA666.7%0.33
36S.Gu🇨🇳 CHINA666.7%0.33
37B.Donkersloot🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS666.7%0.33
38F.Chan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1266.7%0.42
39P.Coppens🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS862.5%0.62
40M.Krysa🇵🇱 POLAND1258.3%0.75

Declarer-play accuracy↑ top

How often declarer took at least the double-dummy makeable tricks after the actual opening lead — i.e. didn’t leave tricks on the table. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamContractsOn targetConceded
1B.Marie🇫🇷 FRANCE2095.0%0.05
2B.Kristensen🇺🇸 USA 14584.4%0.16
3K.Rosenberg🇺🇸 USA 14383.7%0.16
4C.Bakke🇳🇴 NORWAY4281.0%0.24
5I.Gronkvist🇸🇪 SWEDEN5978.0%0.27
6E.Flaatt🇳🇴 NORWAY4077.5%0.30
7O.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN4276.2%0.29
8M.Fourre🇫🇷 FRANCE2576.0%0.24
9C.Deheeger🇫🇷 FRANCE3775.7%0.32
10M.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN4475.0%0.36
11M.Scheie🇳🇴 NORWAY3974.4%0.33
12J.Safsten🇸🇪 SWEDEN3073.3%0.43
13F.Beugin🇫🇷 FRANCE2166.7%0.33
14A.Boulin🇫🇷 FRANCE4465.9%0.43
15C.Huber🇺🇸 USA 15164.7%0.41
16J.Saether🇳🇴 NORWAY3360.6%0.52
17T.Vincenot🇫🇷 FRANCE2657.7%0.58
18O.Kriegel🇺🇸 USA 13056.7%0.53
19T.Sprinkhuizen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS8100.0%0.00
20J.Tsang🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG988.9%0.11
21C.Zhu🇨🇳 CHINA1384.6%0.31
22S.Chen🇨🇳 CHINA683.3%0.17
23S.Tseng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1181.8%0.27
24L.Tijssen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1573.3%0.53
25B.Krawczyk🇵🇱 POLAND1172.7%0.27
26B.Miao🇨🇳 CHINA1172.7%0.55
27S.Gu🇨🇳 CHINA771.4%0.43
28M.Sobczak🇵🇱 POLAND1770.6%0.41
29M.Ng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG666.7%0.33
30F.Chan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1266.7%0.50
31B.Donkersloot🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS666.7%0.50
32M.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1464.3%0.36
33P.Marcinowski🇵🇱 POLAND1464.3%0.36
34M.Krysa🇵🇱 POLAND1464.3%0.43
35P.Coppens🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS862.5%0.50
36L.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS757.1%0.43
37K.Jin🇨🇳 CHINA1450.0%0.50
38V.Wan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG650.0%0.50
39Q.Wang🇨🇳 CHINA1050.0%0.50
40L.Lee🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1546.7%0.53

Defensive accuracy↑ top

How often the defenders held declarer to the double-dummy makeable (or fewer) — charged to both defenders on the board. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOn targetConceded
1B.Kristensen🇺🇸 USA 18991.0%0.10
2K.Rosenberg🇺🇸 USA 18991.0%0.10
3C.Bakke🇳🇴 NORWAY8290.2%0.11
4E.Flaatt🇳🇴 NORWAY8290.2%0.11
5O.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN11289.3%0.11
6J.Safsten🇸🇪 SWEDEN11289.3%0.11
7A.Boulin🇫🇷 FRANCE6687.9%0.12
8C.Deheeger🇫🇷 FRANCE6687.9%0.12
9I.Gronkvist🇸🇪 SWEDEN7586.7%0.17
10M.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN7586.7%0.17
11J.Saether🇳🇴 NORWAY9182.4%0.18
12M.Scheie🇳🇴 NORWAY9182.4%0.18
13C.Huber🇺🇸 USA 19981.8%0.26
14O.Kriegel🇺🇸 USA 19981.8%0.26
15F.Beugin🇫🇷 FRANCE3580.0%0.20
16M.Fourre🇫🇷 FRANCE3580.0%0.20
17B.Marie🇫🇷 FRANCE4671.7%0.35
18T.Vincenot🇫🇷 FRANCE4671.7%0.35
19S.Gu🇨🇳 CHINA10100.0%0.00
20B.Miao🇨🇳 CHINA10100.0%0.00
21T.Sprinkhuizen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1989.5%0.10
22L.Tijssen🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1989.5%0.10
23F.Chan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG2487.5%0.12
24M.Ng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG2487.5%0.12
25K.Jin🇨🇳 CHINA1586.7%0.13
26C.Zhu🇨🇳 CHINA1586.7%0.13
27P.Marcinowski🇵🇱 POLAND2584.0%0.20
28M.Sobczak🇵🇱 POLAND2584.0%0.20
29S.Chen🇨🇳 CHINA2584.0%0.28
30Q.Wang🇨🇳 CHINA2584.0%0.28
31B.Krawczyk🇵🇱 POLAND2982.8%0.24
32M.Krysa🇵🇱 POLAND2982.8%0.24
33L.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS2080.0%0.25
34M.Stougie🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS2080.0%0.25
35L.Lee🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1877.8%0.33
36J.Tsang🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1877.8%0.33
37S.Tseng🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1172.7%0.46
38V.Wan🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG1172.7%0.46
39P.Coppens🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1471.4%0.29
40B.Donkersloot🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS1471.4%0.29

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOpp /bdRaw /bdAdj /bdΔ
1I.Gronkvist🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.04+0.71+0.66·
2M.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.04+0.71+0.66·
3O.Rimstedt🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.12+0.43+0.31·
4J.Safsten🇸🇪 SWEDEN196-0.12+0.43+0.31·
5B.Kristensen🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.04+0.25+0.30▲2
6K.Rosenberg🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.04+0.25+0.30▲2
7C.Bakke🇳🇴 NORWAY196-0.21+0.38+0.17▼2
8E.Flaatt🇳🇴 NORWAY196-0.21+0.38+0.17▼2
9J.Saether🇳🇴 NORWAY196-0.10-0.07-0.17·
10M.Scheie🇳🇴 NORWAY196-0.10-0.07-0.17·
11C.Huber🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.13-0.35-0.22▲2
12O.Kriegel🇺🇸 USA 1196+0.13-0.35-0.22▲2
13B.Marie🇫🇷 FRANCE126+0.27-0.52-0.25▲2
14T.Vincenot🇫🇷 FRANCE126+0.27-0.52-0.25▲2
15A.Boulin🇫🇷 FRANCE182-0.18-0.10-0.28▼4
16C.Deheeger🇫🇷 FRANCE182-0.18-0.10-0.28▼4
17F.Beugin🇫🇷 FRANCE84+0.10-0.53-0.43·
18M.Fourre🇫🇷 FRANCE84+0.10-0.53-0.43·