ROMAGUERA Nuria · MSV
96rank
-12.7Butler · 8 bds
-1.59per board
±4.0swing
-0.62vs par /bd
-0.90adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -0.38 · play -0.25
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.68/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.90/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 50.0% (2) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (1) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (3) · a suit -1.00 (5)
vs par by level: part-score -1.00 (2) · game -0.50 (6)
By role: declaring -1.28/bd (-2.80 vs par · 5) · defending -2.10/bd (+3.00 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.35/bd (-3.00 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -1.82/bd (+1.75 vs par · 4)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 9 | A.Wasik | BHATNAGAR DEVI MUTHU – A.Sharma | Open | 8 | -12.7 | -1.59 | -0.62 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.7 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 2 | 4♥ | ♣9 | = | +3 |
| -1.0 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 1 | 3♥ | ♦A | -3 | -2 |
| -1.3 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 8 | 3NT | ♦5 | +2 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 3 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +9 |
| -1.5 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 5 | 2NT | ♦2 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.6 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 6 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| -5.6 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 7 | 4♠ | ♥J | -1 | -6 |
| -6.0 | Round 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 4 | 5♠ | ♣7 | -3 | -9 |