🇳🇱 SPRINKHUIZEN Malou · NETHERLANDS
88rank
-21.9Butler · 15 bds
-1.46per board
±4.0swing
-1.53vs par /bd
-1.02adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.44/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.02/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 37.2% (16/43)
vs par by strain: NT +1.67 (6) · a suit -3.67 (9)
vs par by level: part-score -1.17 (6) · game -1.78 (9)
By role: declaring -0.57/bd (-4.17 vs par · 6) · defending -2.06/bd (+0.22 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.62/bd (-1.62 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -1.27/bd (-1.43 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 16 | E.Poppe | I.Gronkvist – E.Ovelius | Open | 15 | -21.9 | -1.46 | -1.53 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.7 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 17 | 3♦ | = | +0 | |
| +3.7 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 20 | 2♦ | -2 | +2 | |
| +3.5 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 22 | 3NT | +1 | +1 | |
| +0.9 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 30 | 2♠ | +3 | +6 | |
| +0.5 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 25 | 3NT | = | +0 | |
| +0.3 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 16 | 3NT | +2 | +11 | |
| -0.1 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 18 | 4♥ | = | -11 | |
| -0.7 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 28 | 3NT | +1 | -4 | |
| -1.2 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 23 | 2♠ | +2 | -1 | |
| -1.3 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 21 | 3NT | +1 | +13 | |
| -2.1 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 24 | 3♠ | = | -1 | |
| -4.7 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 19 | 5♣x | -2 | -2 | |
| -6.3 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 29 | 4♥ | -2 | -13 | |
| -8.8 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 26 | 3NT | +1 | -11 | |
| -9.3 | Round of 16 | 🇸🇪 SWEDEN | 27 | 3♣x | = | -13 |