🇭🇰 SIMPSON Wendy Ho · HONG KONG CHINA
79rank
-14.0Butler · 15 bds
-0.93per board
±5.9swing
-0.87vs par /bd
-0.05adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.89/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.05/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 44.4% (20/45)
vs par by strain: NT +1.25 (4) · a suit -1.64 (11)
vs par by level: part-score +3.67 (6) · game -4.38 (8) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.83/bd (-1.57 vs par · 7) · defending -1.02/bd (-0.25 vs par · 8)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.37/bd (-2.71 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -2.08/bd (+0.75 vs par · 8)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 16 | P.Ling | S.Baldysz – C.Baldysz | Open | 15 | -14.0 | -0.93 | -0.87 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.5 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 10 | 6♠ | = | +0 | |
| +3.7 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 3 | 3NT | -2 | +5 | |
| +2.7 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 7 | 3♠ | = | +0 | |
| +2.3 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 6 | 3♥ | -1 | +1 | |
| +1.8 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 11 | 2♥ | +2 | +6 | |
| +1.4 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 14 | 2♠ | -2 | +0 | |
| +0.1 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 2 | 3NT | = | +1 | |
| -0.5 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 1 | 3♣ | -3 | +6 | |
| -0.8 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 8 | 4♠ | +1 | +0 | |
| -0.9 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 5 | 3NT | +2 | -1 | |
| -1.4 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 13 | 3NT | +2 | +0 | |
| -1.7 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 15 | 3♦ | -4 | +9 | |
| -2.1 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 9 | 4♥ | +2 | -12 | |
| -12.1 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 4 | 4♥x | +1 | -13 | |
| -16.0 | Round of 16 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 12 | 5♣x | -6 | -15 |