VILLAS-BOAS Miguel · DORSI
vs par split: bidding +0.40 · play +0.04
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.01/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.22/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 88.2% #36 of 469 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 469 · defence 80.0% #377 of 471
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 75.0% (4) | 92.3% (13) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (10) |
| Defence | 77.8% (9) | 80.8% (26) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 83.3% (6) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +0.75 (16) · a suit +0.35 (54)
vs par by level: part-score +0.28 (25) · game +0.72 (36) · slam -0.22 (9)
By role: declaring +1.27/bd (-0.94 vs par · 35) · defending -0.81/bd (+1.83 vs par · 35)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.31/bd (+0.20 vs par · 35) · not vulnerable +0.77/bd (+0.69 vs par · 35)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | J.Campos | P.Yeung – W.Li | Open | 10 | +0.8 | +0.08 | +0.30 |
| Round 4 | J.Campos | P.Niedzielski – J.Makaruk | Open | 10 | +17.3 | +1.73 | +3.70 |
| Round 5 | J.Campos | J.Schermer – N.Chambers | Open | 10 | -9.7 | -0.97 | -2.40 |
| Round 6 | J.Campos | R.Chen – J.Huang | Open | 10 | -2.5 | -0.25 | +2.00 |
| Round 7 | J.Campos | S.Limaye – S.Sankholkar | Closed | 10 | +23.1 | +2.31 | +2.60 |
| Round 11 | J.Campos | L.Bojoh – J.Tueje | Open | 10 | +0.2 | +0.02 | +0.90 |
| Round 12 | J.Campos | I.Sime – J.Murdoch | Open | 10 | -13.0 | -1.30 | -4.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.2 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 4 | 4♥x | ♣5 | -3 | +12 |
| +9.1 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 21 | 3♠x | ♣7 | = | +12 |
| +8.8 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 29 | 6♠ | ♥8 | = | +0 |
| +8.4 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 8 | 5♥x | ♠A | -2 | +9 |
| +8.2 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 18 | 3NT | ♠3 | -2 | +13 |
| +7.5 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 24 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | +7 |
| +6.9 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 10 | 4♣ | ♥7 | +2 | +1 |
| +6.8 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 5 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | +7 |
| +6.6 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 4 | 4♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +6.2 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 17 | 6♣ | ♠J | = | -2 |
| +6.2 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 3 | 3♠ | ♥A | = | +11 |
| +6.2 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 13 | 2NT | ♠2 | = | +11 |
| +5.1 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 30 | 6♠ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| +4.5 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 15 | 3NT | ♣6 | -2 | +8 |
| +4.0 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 22 | 5♦x | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.2 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 14 | 2♠ | ♣5 | -1 | +4 |
| +3.1 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 1 | 2NT | ♠4 | +1 | +10 |
| +3.0 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 27 | 3♥x | ♣4 | -2 | +9 |
| +2.9 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 2 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | +6 |
| +2.5 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 3 | 3♥ | ♦7 | = | +1 |
| +2.5 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 21 | 5♣x | ♥A | -3 | +4 |
| +2.4 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 28 | 4♥ | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 12 | 5♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 11 | 3NT | ♥3 | +2 | -10 |
| +1.9 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 7 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 16 | 4♥ | ♣3 | = | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 12 | 5♦x | ♥Q | -3 | +4 |
| +1.5 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 23 | 5♦ | ♠Q | +1 | -13 |
| +1.4 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 22 | 2♠ | ♥J | +1 | -8 |
| +1.2 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 22 | 5♣x | ♦A | -1 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 9 | 2♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 10 | 1NT | ♠7 | +1 | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 6 | 4♥ | ♣J | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 27 | 2♠ | ♣K | -2 | +1 |
| -0.5 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 30 | 5♥ | ♣K | = | +11 |
| -0.5 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 5 | 3♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +1 |
| -0.5 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 23 | 1NT | ♥4 | +2 | -1 |
| -0.8 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 1 | 3♦ | ♠7 | +3 | +4 |
| -0.9 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 18 | 2NT | ♦2 | -1 | -10 |
| -0.9 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 30 | 2NT | ♠K | -2 | +1 |
| -0.9 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 28 | 4♥ | ♦K | +2 | -11 |
| -1.1 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 26 | 4♥ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 14 | 4♥ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| -1.3 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 7 | 3NT | ♠5 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 25 | 2♠ | ♥A | +1 | -6 |
| -1.5 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 16 | 2♠ | ♥10 | -1 | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 27 | 7NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 25 | 3NT | ♦2 | +2 | -1 |
| -2.0 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 24 | 4♣ | ♦3 | = | -6 |
| -2.2 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 6 | 3NT | ♦6 | +3 | +10 |
| -2.2 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 19 | 6♠ | ♥7 | +1 | +11 |
| -2.4 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 19 | 4♠ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 13 | 4♥x | ♣K | -1 | -2 |
| -2.7 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 2 | 2♠ | ♥5 | -2 | -6 |
| -2.8 | Round 7 | KELKAR | 8 | 4♠ | ♦J | +1 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 24 | 2♥x | ♦7 | -2 | -4 |
| -3.0 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 25 | 3♣ | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 20 | 5♣ | ♦A | = | -3 |
| -3.8 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 21 | 2♦ | ♣10 | -2 | -6 |
| -5.1 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 17 | 3NT | ♠2 | -1 | -10 |
| -5.2 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 28 | 5♣ | ♥7 | -2 | +0 |
| -6.0 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 26 | 5♦ | ♠A | +1 | -9 |
| -6.4 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 20 | 3NT | ♥7 | -2 | -7 |
| -6.8 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 26 | 6♠ | ♠7 | = | +0 |
| -6.9 | Round 3 | HONG KONG SENIOR | 23 | 4♥ | ♦3 | = | -3 |
| -7.7 | Round 5 | SCHWARTZ | 11 | 6♦ | ♥2 | -2 | -11 |
| -7.8 | Round 12 | SCOTLAND | 29 | 6♦ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -7.9 | Round 6 | CHINESE TAIPEI | 29 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| -9.1 | Round 4 | CONSUS RED POLAND | 9 | 7♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -12.0 | Round 11 | INA LADIES DJARUM LA | 15 | 3♦x | ♣6 | = | -11 |