GINSBERG Candice · SYDNEY
vs par split: bidding -0.33 · play -0.67
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.28/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.76/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 83.3% · declarer play 70.0% · defence 86.4%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 77.8% (9) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 88.9% (18) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (4) · ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -4.10 (10) · a suit +0.07 (30)
vs par by level: part-score +1.54 (13) · game -3.91 (22) · slam +5.40 (5)
By role: declaring -0.27/bd (-3.77 vs par · 17) · defending -1.62/bd (+1.09 vs par · 23)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.45/bd (+1.16 vs par · 19) · not vulnerable -1.59/bd (-2.90 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 6 | B.Travis | J.Liu – X.Hou | Closed | 10 | -24.1 | -2.41 | -0.10 |
| Round 7 | B.Travis | Y.Lian – J.Bian | Open | 10 | -16.3 | -1.63 | -1.90 |
| Round 11 | B.Travis | K.Steffensen – C.Miller | Closed | 10 | -0.2 | -0.02 | +1.30 |
| Round 12 | B.Travis | K.Jin – X.Bao | Open | 10 | -1.3 | -0.13 | -3.20 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.5 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 29 | 7♦ | ♦10 | -1 | +16 |
| +10.3 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 22 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +11 |
| +10.1 | Round 11 | BERGER | 20 | 2♠ | ♦4 | -2 | +12 |
| +10.1 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 28 | 6♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +5.6 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 1 | 5♦ | ♣A | = | +3 |
| +3.6 | Round 11 | BERGER | 18 | 3♠ | ♣K | -1 | +11 |
| +1.8 | Round 11 | BERGER | 16 | 4♥ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 11 | BERGER | 11 | 5♣ | ♠J | +1 | -11 |
| +0.8 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 23 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | -13 |
| +0.7 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 3 | 3♣ | ♣2 | +2 | -6 |
| -0.3 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 21 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 22 | 2♦ | ♦8 | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 25 | 4♥ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 10 | 1NT | ♥5 | +1 | +1 |
| -0.9 | Round 11 | BERGER | 14 | 2♥ | ♦10 | -2 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 6 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 9 | 2♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -1.3 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 5 | 1NT | ♥10 | +3 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round 11 | BERGER | 19 | 6♠ | ♥5 | = | +11 |
| -1.5 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 27 | 7NT | ♣3 | = | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 23 | 1NT | ♠3 | -2 | -2 |
| -1.9 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 30 | 2♠ | ♥10 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 11 | BERGER | 12 | 4♥ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 2 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | +1 |
| -2.4 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 24 | 4♥ | ♦K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.5 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 21 | 3NT | ♥K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.7 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 27 | 2♥ | ♣4 | -1 | +4 |
| -2.8 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 7 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.0 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 25 | 3♣ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -3.0 | Round 11 | BERGER | 15 | 2♦ | ♠Q | = | +0 |
| -4.2 | Round 11 | BERGER | 13 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -4.4 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 4 | 4♥ | ♣5 | -3 | -5 |
| -5.1 | Round 11 | BERGER | 17 | 3NT | ♠2 | -1 | -10 |
| -5.3 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 30 | 4♠ | ♠6 | +2 | -11 |
| -6.0 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 26 | 5♦ | ♠A | +1 | -9 |
| -6.8 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 26 | 6♠ | ♠7 | = | +0 |
| -7.6 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 28 | 4♥ | ♠2 | -1 | -10 |
| -7.9 | Round 6 | BEIJING SHARESUN | 29 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -8.2 | Round 12 | QUANZHOU FENGDA | 24 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +1 | -11 |
| -8.5 | Round 7 | CHINA HYX | 8 | 4NT | ♥3 | -2 | -11 |