BREDE Lukasz · MORAWSKI
23rank
+84.3Butler · 100 bds
+0.84per board
±5.0swing
+0.39vs par /bd · #119/379
+0.98adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding +0.40 · play -0.01
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.14/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.98/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 89.5% #70 of 379 · declarer play 75.0% #149 of 379 · defence 81.0% #266 of 379
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (6) | 84.6% (13) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (10) | 86.4% (22) |
| Defence | 92.3% (13) | 75.9% (29) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 75.0% (4) · ♥ 83.3% (6) · ♦ 100.0% (6) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +1.13 (30) · a suit +0.07 (70)
vs par by level: part-score -0.64 (44) · game +1.50 (50) · slam -1.33 (6)
By role: declaring +1.25/bd (-1.43 vs par · 58) · defending +0.28/bd (+2.90 vs par · 42)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.19/bd (+0.26 vs par · 53) · not vulnerable +0.45/bd (+0.53 vs par · 47)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | E.Banaszkiewicz | J.Herland – R.Nyheim | Closed | 10 | +23.3 | +2.33 | +0.30 |
| Round 2 | E.Banaszkiewicz | P.Cronier – C.D'Ovidio | Closed | 10 | +5.6 | +0.56 | -2.00 |
| Round 3 | E.Banaszkiewicz | B.Rubach – I.Jenssen | Closed | 10 | -9.5 | -0.95 | -0.40 |
| Round 4 | E.Banaszkiewicz | K.Thomassen – S.Holmoy | Closed | 10 | +2.6 | +0.26 | +2.10 |
| Round 5 | E.Banaszkiewicz | E.Ozturk – F.Cakici | Closed | 10 | +13.9 | +1.39 | -1.50 |
| Round 6 | E.Banaszkiewicz | M.Cichocki – D.Hocheker | Closed | 10 | +21.4 | +2.14 | +1.80 |
| Round 7 | E.Banaszkiewicz | S.Gross – D.Gold | Closed | 10 | +14.9 | +1.49 | +0.30 |
| Round 8 | E.Banaszkiewicz | S.Cope – M.Robertson | Closed | 10 | -7.1 | -0.71 | -0.80 |
| Round 9 | E.Banaszkiewicz | W.Frisby – E.Caplan | Closed | 10 | +3.7 | +0.37 | +2.30 |
| Round 10 | E.Banaszkiewicz | D.Lu – Y.Huang | Closed | 10 | +15.5 | +1.55 | +1.80 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +14.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 23 | 6♠x | ♥3 | -2 | +15 |
| +12.6 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 9 | 6♣ | ♦A | = | +13 |
| +12.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 22 | 4♠x | ♣A | = | +13 |
| +11.0 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 3 | 4♠ | ♣3 | = | +10 |
| +10.7 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 3 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | +11 |
| +9.9 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 15 | 4♥x | ♠A | -3 | -3 |
| +9.0 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 21 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +8 |
| +7.8 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 13 | 4♠ | ♣2 | +2 | +1 |
| +7.7 | Round 7 | GOLD | 5 | 4♥x | ♦A | +2 | -5 |
| +7.6 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 3 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | +11 |
| +7.4 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 25 | 4♠x | ♣A | -2 | +13 |
| +7.3 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 26 | 3NT | ♥4 | -3 | +14 |
| +6.9 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 2 | 2♦ | ♥Q | -3 | +5 |
| +6.8 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 19 | 4♦ | ♥5 | -3 | +5 |
| +6.5 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 15 | 6♠ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +6.3 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 11 | 5♣ | ♥A | -2 | +14 |
| +6.3 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 24 | 3NT | ♣7 | = | +6 |
| +5.7 | Round 7 | GOLD | 1 | 5♣ | ♠A | -2 | +11 |
| +5.5 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 25 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| +4.2 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 11 | 6NT | ♦10 | +1 | -11 |
| +3.5 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 21 | 1NT | ♣5 | +1 | +0 |
| +3.5 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 11 | 5♦ | ♥7 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.4 | Round 7 | GOLD | 8 | 4NT | ♠2 | +1 | +1 |
| +3.0 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 2 | 2♠ | ♦J | = | -1 |
| +3.0 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 12 | 3NT | ♥5 | -1 | +5 |
| +3.0 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 19 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -4 |
| +2.7 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 1 | 3♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +7 |
| +2.6 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 4 | 2♠ | ♥5 | = | +6 |
| +2.5 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 10 | 3NT | ♦8 | +3 | +1 |
| +2.5 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 20 | 2♥ | ♠9 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 7 | 3♥ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 24 | 3♥ | ♥10 | -1 | -2 |
| +2.0 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 21 | 2NT | ♦9 | = | +7 |
| +1.9 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 6 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | +8 |
| +1.8 | Round 7 | GOLD | 9 | 3♥ | ♦7 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.7 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 6 | 4♥ | ♦4 | +2 | -13 |
| +1.7 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 26 | 2♠ | ♠J | = | +6 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 20 | 3NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.5 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 22 | 3NT | ♦7 | -1 | +13 |
| +1.4 | Round 7 | GOLD | 7 | 3♣ | ♥7 | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 4 | 1NT | ♠6 | +1 | +1 |
| +1.3 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 8 | 3♣ | ♣J | -1 | +4 |
| +1.2 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 7 | 5♦ | ♣J | +1 | +17 |
| +1.2 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 17 | 2♠ | ♦Q | = | +7 |
| +1.1 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 6 | 3NT | ♥J | = | +3 |
| +1.1 | Round 7 | GOLD | 10 | 3NT | ♥K | = | -2 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 19 | 2♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 7 | 2♠ | ♣7 | = | -1 |
| +0.9 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 9 | 4♥ | ♠K | +1 | -13 |
| +0.8 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 13 | 1NT | ♦3 | -1 | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 5 | 3♣ | ♦4 | -2 | +2 |
| +0.7 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 23 | 3♦ | ♠2 | = | -9 |
| +0.7 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 26 | 1♥ | ♠4 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 14 | 2♣ | ♦Q | +3 | -7 |
| +0.5 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 18 | 4♥ | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 30 | 2♦ | ♦J | +3 | +7 |
| +0.3 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 9 | 1NT | ♥5 | = | -2 |
| +0.2 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 8 | 2♥ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 7 | GOLD | 3 | 2♠ | ♣A | -2 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 29 | 3NT | ♦2 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 7 | GOLD | 2 | 3NT | ♠A | +1 | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 10 | 4♥ | ♠2 | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 16 | 1NT | ♥7 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.5 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 15 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -2 | -2 |
| -0.6 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 18 | 3NT | ♣10 | +1 | +1 |
| -0.9 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 14 | 3♣ | ♦3 | +2 | -6 |
| -1.0 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 18 | 3NT | ♥6 | -2 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 30 | 4♠ | ♥K | -2 | -5 |
| -1.1 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 1 | 4♠ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 27 | 2♠ | ♣8 | = | +7 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 14 | 3♣ | ♦3 | -2 | -5 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 17 | 3NT | ♥4 | +2 | +10 |
| -1.4 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 27 | 3♥ | ♠A | +1 | +2 |
| -1.7 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 17 | 1NT | ♠6 | +1 | -7 |
| -1.7 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 4 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| -1.8 | Round 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 30 | 2NT | ♠7 | = | +1 |
| -2.3 | Round 7 | GOLD | 6 | 3♠ | ♦K | -2 | -2 |
| -2.7 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 1 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 12 | 3NT | ♠6 | +2 | -1 |
| -3.4 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 8 | 2♥ | ♣Q | -1 | -4 |
| -3.7 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 29 | 2♥ | ♠5 | -2 | -3 |
| -3.7 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 23 | 4♦ | ♣A | +1 | -10 |
| -3.8 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 10 | 2♠ | ♣A | -1 | -6 |
| -3.9 | Round 7 | GOLD | 4 | 1NT | ♥2 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.7 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 22 | 3NT | ♦2 | -2 | -6 |
| -4.8 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 25 | 3♥ | ♣A | +1 | -6 |
| -4.9 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 27 | 4♥x | ♠A | -2 | -5 |
| -5.0 | Round 3 | I SISTE ELITEN | 28 | 4♦ | ♦8 | +1 | -7 |
| -5.2 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 16 | 3NT | ♠7 | = | -11 |
| -6.5 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 24 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -6.9 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 16 | 4♥ | ♥10 | -2 | -11 |
| -7.5 | Round 5 | MIKLAGARD | 12 | 4♠ | ♥2 | = | -1 |
| -7.9 | Round 4 | QUEENS AND JACKS | 5 | 4♥ | ♦6 | +1 | -1 |
| -8.2 | Round 2 | ZIMMERMANN | 13 | 4♠ | ♠4 | = | -10 |
| -8.3 | Round 8 | ROBERTSON | 20 | 4♥ | ♥6 | -2 | -12 |
| -9.0 | Round 9 | MELBOURNE 1 | 28 | 6♠ | ♠4 | = | -11 |
| -9.6 | Round 1 | NORGE 4 | 5 | 6♠ | ♣6 | -1 | -14 |
| -10.7 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 29 | 2♠x | ♥Q | = | -11 |