ZIMMERMANN Pierre · ZIMMERMANN
vs par split: bidding -1.50 · play +0.12
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.32/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.69/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 77.8% · declarer play 86.7% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 33.3% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 90.9% (11) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 100.0% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.70 (10) · a suit -2.03 (32)
vs par by level: part-score -1.53 (15) · game -0.50 (24) · slam -7.67 (3)
By role: declaring -0.28/bd (-4.08 vs par · 25) · defending +1.33/bd (+2.59 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.59/bd (-1.09 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.84/bd (-1.67 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 16 | J.Zochowska | S.Cope – M.Robertson | Closed | 14 | -0.8 | -0.06 | -3.07 |
| Quarterfinal | J.Zochowska | T.Charlsen – J.Larsson | Open | 14 | +27.5 | +1.96 | +0.43 |
| Semifinal | J.Zochowska | T.Bakkeren – C.Madsen | Closed | 14 | -10.9 | -0.78 | -1.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.1 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 7 | 7♠ | ♣8 | = | +0 |
| +10.3 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 12 | 5♥ | ♠J | -1 | +11 |
| +9.6 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 4 | 3NT | ♣Q | +2 | +0 |
| +6.1 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 3 | 4♠ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +5.5 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 16 | 5♥ | ♠K | -1 | +5 |
| +5.0 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 28 | 4♠ | ♣A | -1 | +6 |
| +4.7 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 15 | 2♥ | ♠A | = | +6 |
| +4.5 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 25 | 5♣ | ♦5 | = | -13 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 4 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +9 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 11 | 2♠ | ♦7 | +3 | +12 |
| +3.6 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 13 | 4♠ | ♠6 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.9 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 12 | 2♠ | ♦K | -1 | +2 |
| +1.7 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 23 | 3NT | ♥2 | = | -1 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 8 | 3♥ | ♦K | -3 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 19 | 1NT | ♥7 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 2 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 9 | 4♣ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 10 | 3NT | ♦K | +1 | +13 |
| +0.4 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 2 | 3♦ | ♦2 | -2 | +8 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 5 | 5♦x | ♣Q | = | -12 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 9 | 4♠ | ♣8 | = | +0 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 13 | 4♥ | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 1 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 22 | 4♥ | ♠8 | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 26 | 3NT | ♦10 | -2 | -8 |
| -0.9 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 11 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -0.9 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 14 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | -1 |
| -1.3 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 1 | 2NT | ♦8 | = | +1 |
| -1.3 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 6 | 4♣ | ♠K | +2 | -13 |
| -1.4 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 6 | 3♦ | ♦2 | +2 | -8 |
| -1.5 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 27 | 3♠ | ♣6 | -2 | -9 |
| -1.9 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 8 | 4♥ | ♣2 | -1 | -8 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 14 | 3NT | ♦6 | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 17 | 4♥ | ♣10 | -2 | -1 |
| -3.1 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 21 | 1NT | ♠3 | +1 | -6 |
| -3.9 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 24 | 2♠ | ♥2 | +2 | -6 |
| -4.0 | Quarterfinal | CASINO FLOOR | 5 | 3♣ | ♠A | -1 | -5 |
| -4.5 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 18 | 6♣ | ♦A | -1 | -10 |
| -5.7 | Round of 16 | ROBERTSON | 20 | 4♥ | ♠8 | -1 | -6 |
| -6.0 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 10 | 4♦ | ♣10 | -1 | -6 |
| -7.3 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 3 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +2 | -11 |
| -12.7 | Semifinal | WHITE HOUSE | 7 | 6♥ | ♠3 | -1 | -13 |