GREEN Marcia · GREEN

8rank
+5.9Butler · 14 bds
+0.42per board
±3.3swing
+0.36vs par /bd
-0.07adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.21 · play +0.57

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.49/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.07/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%

Bidding activity — not a pass: 31.6% (12/38)

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)100.0% (3)
Declarer play100.0% (1)100.0% (3)
Defence100.0% (2)100.0% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +1.40 (5) · a suit -0.22 (9)

vs par by level: part-score -1.00 (7) · game +1.71 (7)

By role: declaring -0.23/bd (-1.67 vs par · 6) · defending +0.91/bd (+1.88 vs par · 8)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.03/bd (-1.57 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +0.81/bd (+2.29 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalH.DhondyK.Mccallum – L.BakerClosed14+5.9+0.42+0.36

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+5.7SemifinalBAKER11NT♣3-1+5
+5.3SemifinalBAKER42♠♥A-2-9
+5.3SemifinalBAKER84♠♣5-2+11
+3.3SemifinalBAKER33NT♥5+1+0
+1.0SemifinalBAKER73♦♣A=+0
+0.3SemifinalBAKER134♥♣9=+1
-0.0SemifinalBAKER114♥♣A+1+0
-0.0SemifinalBAKER123NT♣6+2+0
-0.3SemifinalBAKER141NT♦Q+1+1
-0.7SemifinalBAKER24♥♠7=-1
-2.0SemifinalBAKER62♠♥2+2+6
-3.0SemifinalBAKER93NT♦3=+1
-4.3SemifinalBAKER53♣♦7=+0
-4.7SemifinalBAKER104♣♣4+1-10