🇳🇱 BERWALD Juliet · NETHERLANDS
vs par split: bidding +1.75 · play -0.08
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.50/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.83/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 83.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 33.3% (3) |
| Defence | · | 83.3% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -0.50 (2) · a suit +2.10 (10)
vs par by level: part-score +0.60 (5) · game +2.83 (6) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.17/bd (-2.00 vs par · 6) · defending +1.48/bd (+5.33 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +2.38/bd (-0.17 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable +0.27/bd (+3.50 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | M.Lejeune | G.Fibert – L.Petelko | Closed | 12 | +15.9 | +1.32 | +1.67 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.9 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 10 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| +6.9 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 7 | 6♠ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| +4.4 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 1 | 4♠ | ♣6 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.0 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 2 | 4♦ | ♣A | = | +5 |
| +2.7 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 4 | 2NT | ♠5 | = | -1 |
| +1.3 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 11 | 3♠ | ♦A | -2 | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 12 | 4♥ | ♦K | +1 | +17 |
| +0.3 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 5 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | +6 |
| -0.4 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 3 | 2♥ | ♣K | +3 | +6 |
| -1.4 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 6 | 3♥ | ♣8 | -1 | -6 |
| -1.4 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 9 | 4♠ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -9.4 | Round 5 | 🇮🇱 ISRAEL | 8 | 5♥ | ♣7 | -1 | -11 |