IJSSELMUIDEN Peter · BC’T ONSTEIN
vs par split: bidding -1.09 · play +0.44
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.41/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.34/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% #66 of 71 · declarer play 80.0% #26 of 71 · defence 83.3% #39 of 71
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 40.0% (5) | 85.7% (7) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 75.0% (8) | 90.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 66.7% (3) · ♥ 0.0% (2) · ♦ 80.0% (5) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -0.60 (15) · a suit -0.71 (17)
vs par by level: part-score -2.80 (15) · game +0.27 (15) · slam +8.50 (2)
By role: declaring -0.49/bd (-4.64 vs par · 14) · defending +0.50/bd (+2.44 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.06/bd (-1.81 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +0.07/bd (+0.50 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | G.Steenbakkers | J.Quantin – C.Lorenzini | Closed | 16 | -3.6 | -0.23 | -0.62 |
| Final | G.Steenbakkers | E.Eide – T.Roren | Closed | 16 | +5.8 | +0.36 | -0.69 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.0 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 10 | 6♦ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +6.0 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 9 | 6♥ | ♦6 | -1 | +17 |
| +5.3 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 5 | 4♠ | ♣4 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.6 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 14 | 3NT | ♥2 | -4 | +8 |
| +4.4 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 8 | 2♠ | ♣7 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.3 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 6 | 3♠ | ♦4 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.2 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 13 | 1NT | ♠4 | = | -2 |
| +1.3 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 16 | 3NT | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 2 | 3♣ | ♥3 | +1 | -10 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 16 | 4♥ | ♦8 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 1 | 2♠ | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 7 | 3NT | ♦J | +1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 8 | 3♥ | ♠A | = | -6 |
| +0.3 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 11 | 3♥ | ♦A | -1 | -4 |
| -0.2 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 15 | 3♠ | ♦7 | = | +6 |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 13 | 3NT | ♣Q | +2 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 3 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 5 | 3NT | ♦3 | = | +1 |
| -0.5 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 4 | 3♥ | ♠2 | -1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 12 | 4♥ | ♣Q | = | +1 |
| -1.0 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 12 | 1NT | ♥2 | +2 | -2 |
| -1.0 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 2 | 1NT | ♥5 | +1 | -6 |
| -1.0 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 15 | 1NT | ♠A | -1 | +0 |
| -1.9 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 14 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 6 | 4NT | ♥9 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 9 | 3NT | ♦4 | -1 | +6 |
| -2.6 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 3 | 3NT | ♣Q | -2 | -6 |
| -2.9 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 4 | 3NT | ♠9 | -2 | -8 |
| -2.9 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 11 | 2♣ | ♦7 | -1 | -3 |
| -3.9 | Semifinal | ZALESKI | 10 | 2♣ | ♦3 | +2 | -15 |
| -5.0 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 7 | 2♠ | ♠2 | -1 | -5 |
| -7.1 | Final | VIKERSUND BK | 1 | 4♠ | ♦K | +3 | -14 |