ZAWISLAK Slawek · BRIDGE FOR BUSINESS
vs par split: bidding +1.52 · play -0.45
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.31/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.10/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 73.3% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 100.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 40.6% (52/128)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (4) | 81.8% (11) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 75.0% (8) |
| Defence | 100.0% (6) | 100.0% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 25.0% (4) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +6.10 (10) · a suit -0.50 (32)
vs par by level: part-score +1.08 (12) · game +0.52 (25) · slam +3.80 (5)
By role: declaring -0.18/bd (-2.47 vs par · 19) · defending +0.90/bd (+4.00 vs par · 23)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.29/bd (+1.14 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +0.53/bd (+1.00 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | M.Blach | E.Olla – K.Rubins | Open | 14 | -12.9 | -0.92 | -1.57 |
| Round 6 | J.Ciechomski | J.Sigsgaard – E.Rosthoej | Open | 14 | +7.6 | +0.54 | +3.21 |
| Round 8 | J.Ciechomski | K.Polap – E.Lindenthal | Open | 14 | +22.5 | +1.61 | +1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 25 | 1NT | ♣A | -3 | +11 |
| +8.3 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 16 | 7♥x | ♦A | -1 | +12 |
| +8.2 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 24 | 6♠ | ♣K | +1 | +11 |
| +7.8 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 3 | 4♠ | ♣J | = | +0 |
| +7.5 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 22 | 3NTx | ♣3 | -2 | +9 |
| +6.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 27 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +7 |
| +6.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 5 | 4♥ | ♦A | +1 | +1 |
| +5.8 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 28 | 4♠ | ♦4 | -1 | +6 |
| +5.0 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 26 | 2♣x | ♣A | -2 | -4 |
| +4.0 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 18 | 3♦ | ♥Q | = | +7 |
| +2.4 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 15 | 2♥ | ♦5 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.9 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 28 | 2NT | ♠3 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.6 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 18 | 3NT | ♥K | = | +5 |
| +1.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 20 | 3♦ | ♠Q | -1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 13 | 3♠ | ♦7 | -2 | +10 |
| +1.4 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 15 | 6NT | ♥4 | +1 | +13 |
| +1.4 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 21 | 1NT | ♠8 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.2 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 20 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 21 | 5♣ | ♠Q | = | +11 |
| +0.3 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 17 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | -3 |
| +0.3 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 26 | 4♥ | ♣6 | = | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 9 | 3NT | ♠Q | +3 | +11 |
| +0.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 1 | 4♠ | ♦6 | +2 | +11 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 14 | 4♠ | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 19 | 4♠ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 23 | 5♣ | ♦A | -2 | -7 |
| -0.9 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 16 | 5♥ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 19 | 3NT | ♠4 | +3 | +10 |
| -1.2 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 7 | 6♦ | ♠9 | -1 | -17 |
| -1.6 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 6 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +2 | +1 |
| -1.9 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 10 | 3♥ | ♠A | = | -7 |
| -1.9 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 27 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| -2.4 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 8 | 3♠ | ♣6 | -1 | -4 |
| -3.0 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 22 | 4♠ | ♦T | -1 | -10 |
| -4.3 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 11 | 3NT | ♥6 | -1 | -10 |
| -4.4 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 2 | 2♦ | ♦5 | +2 | -7 |
| -4.4 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 4 | 4♥ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| -5.1 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 17 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | -10 |
| -7.8 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 23 | 6♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -8.2 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 12 | 5♦ | ♣A | +1 | -11 |
| -8.4 | Round 6 | ESKOM | 25 | 2♦ | ♦6 | -4 | -11 |
| -8.5 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 24 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | -7 |