KULOVIC Esad · DR J. TOMLJENOVIC BRIDGE

62rank
-33.4Butler · 16 bds
-2.09per board
±6.0swing
-2.06vs par /bd
-0.86adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -3.12 · play +1.06

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.23/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.86/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 50.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·50.0% (2)
Declarer play100.0% (3)100.0% (4)
Defence·100.0% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 50.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT -1.33 (3) · a suit -2.23 (13)

vs par by level: part-score +0.33 (3) · game -3.90 (10) · slam +1.67 (3)

By role: declaring -2.82/bd (-4.30 vs par · 10) · defending -0.87/bd (+1.67 vs par · 6)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.44/bd (-1.88 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -2.74/bd (-2.25 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalG.BorevkovicF.Hinden – G.OsborneOpen16-33.4-2.09-2.06

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+11.3SemifinalHINDEN46♥♣6-1+17
+4.6SemifinalHINDEN84♠♠J+2+11
+1.3SemifinalHINDEN164♥♦10=+0
+1.2SemifinalHINDEN21NT♦2+1+0
+1.2SemifinalHINDEN54♠♦Q+1+0
+0.9SemifinalHINDEN111NT♠Q+1+0
-0.9SemifinalHINDEN63NT♦7-1-4
-1.0SemifinalHINDEN102♥♣3=+1
-1.5SemifinalHINDEN74♠♦4-2-8
-2.3SemifinalHINDEN36♥♦3=+0
-3.7SemifinalHINDEN15♠♦A+1-11
-4.1SemifinalHINDEN124♥♦5=-7
-4.9SemifinalHINDEN154♥♥5-1-6
-10.7SemifinalHINDEN95♠x♣A-4-5
-11.1SemifinalHINDEN145♦x♣K-3-9
-13.7SemifinalHINDEN137♣♦A=-12