MAGNANI Carlo · CANNAVALE
vs par split: bidding +1.23 · play -0.41
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.12/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.42/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 81.2% #195 of 527 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 527 · defence 77.8% #480 of 527
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (4) | 75.0% (12) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 66.7% (6) | 81.0% (21) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 66.7% (3) · ♥ 83.3% (6) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 75.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +1.18 (11) · a suit +0.68 (28)
vs par by level: part-score -0.12 (16) · game +0.50 (18) · slam +5.00 (5)
By role: declaring +0.48/bd (-0.83 vs par · 12) · defending +0.56/bd (+1.64 vs par · 28)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.46/bd (+0.10 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +1.64/bd (+1.79 vs par · 19)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | G.Percario | C.Sandvik – H.Bremnes | Open | 10 | +6.0 | +0.60 | +3.00 |
| Round 3 | P.Cannavale | T.Elsinen – A.Elsinen | Closed | 10 | +6.3 | +0.63 | +1.00 |
| Round 7 | P.Cannavale | T.Davis – B.Mcguire | Closed | 10 | +23.3 | +2.33 | +2.20 |
| Round 9 | P.Cannavale | X.Li – Y.Wang | Closed | 10 | -14.1 | -1.41 | -2.60 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 5 | 6♥ | ♣A | -2 | +13 |
| +9.1 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 22 | 6♣ | ♦A | -1 | +12 |
| +6.8 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 16 | 3NT | ♥8 | = | +11 |
| +6.1 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 19 | 1NT | ♠7 | +2 | +10 |
| +5.9 | Round 7 | APACHE | 4 | 4♥x | ♠8 | -1 | +2 |
| +5.0 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 29 | 1♠ | ♥A | -2 | +2 |
| +4.9 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 26 | 3♦ | ♠4 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.9 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 30 | 3♥ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +3.6 | Round 7 | APACHE | 1 | 4♠ | ♦8 | -2 | +0 |
| +3.2 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 15 | 4♠x | ♣A | -2 | +5 |
| +3.1 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 28 | 4♠ | ♣Q | -2 | +2 |
| +3.0 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 21 | 5♣ | ♥A | -2 | +6 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 24 | 2♠ | ♦8 | = | +5 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | APACHE | 6 | 3♠ | ♥Q | -1 | -2 |
| +1.6 | Round 7 | APACHE | 3 | 3NT | ♣3 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.4 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 11 | 4♥ | ♠4 | = | +3 |
| +1.4 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 21 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 2 | 3NT | ♥8 | -2 | +7 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 9 | Pass | +4 | ||
| +0.2 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 14 | 4♠ | ♣7 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 7 | APACHE | 10 | 2♠ | ♣8 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 23 | 3NT | ♣3 | +1 | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 20 | 1NT | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 25 | 1NT | ♣5 | +2 | -6 |
| -0.4 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 17 | 3NT | ♣5 | +1 | +1 |
| -0.5 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 28 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 22 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 29 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round 7 | APACHE | 8 | 1NT | ♦Q | +2 | -7 |
| -2.2 | Round 7 | APACHE | 7 | 5♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 30 | 4♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 27 | 2NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 13 | 6♠ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 25 | 2♥ | ♠9 | +1 | -6 |
| -3.7 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 18 | 4♥ | ♣7 | = | -11 |
| -4.1 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 26 | 2♥ | ♦3 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.3 | Round 2 | BREMNES | 12 | 6♠ | ♠5 | = | +11 |
| -4.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 27 | 6♠ | ♥10 | +1 | -11 |
| -8.3 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 24 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -7 |
| -11.8 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 23 | 5♥ | ♦A | -1 | -14 |