CANNAVALE Paola · CANNAVALE
vs par split: bidding +0.31 · play -0.24
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.10/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.62/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 76.2%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (7) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 50.0% (4) | 82.4% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -1.29 (7) · a suit +0.50 (22)
vs par by level: part-score -0.86 (14) · game +0.00 (12) · slam +4.67 (3)
By role: declaring -0.34/bd (-3.00 vs par · 8) · defending +0.83/bd (+1.36 vs par · 22)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.09/bd (-0.19 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +1.21/bd (+0.64 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | C.Magnani | T.Elsinen – A.Elsinen | Closed | 10 | +6.3 | +0.63 | +1.00 |
| Round 7 | C.Magnani | T.Davis – B.Mcguire | Closed | 10 | +23.3 | +2.33 | +2.20 |
| Round 9 | C.Magnani | X.Li – Y.Wang | Closed | 10 | -14.1 | -1.41 | -2.60 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 5 | 6♥ | ♣A | -2 | +13 |
| +9.1 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 22 | 6♣ | ♦A | -1 | +12 |
| +5.9 | Round 7 | APACHE | 4 | 4♥x | ♠8 | -1 | +2 |
| +5.0 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 29 | 1♠ | ♥A | -2 | +2 |
| +4.9 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 26 | 3♦ | ♠4 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.9 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 30 | 3♥ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +3.6 | Round 7 | APACHE | 1 | 4♠ | ♦8 | -2 | +0 |
| +3.1 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 28 | 4♠ | ♣Q | -2 | +2 |
| +3.0 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 21 | 5♣ | ♥A | -2 | +6 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 24 | 2♠ | ♦8 | = | +5 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | APACHE | 6 | 3♠ | ♥Q | -1 | -2 |
| +1.6 | Round 7 | APACHE | 3 | 3NT | ♣3 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.4 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 21 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 2 | 3NT | ♥8 | -2 | +7 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | APACHE | 9 | Pass | +4 | ||
| +0.2 | Round 7 | APACHE | 10 | 2♠ | ♣8 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 23 | 3NT | ♣3 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 25 | 1NT | ♣5 | +2 | -6 |
| -0.5 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 28 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 22 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 29 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round 7 | APACHE | 8 | 1NT | ♦Q | +2 | -7 |
| -2.2 | Round 7 | APACHE | 7 | 5♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 30 | 4♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 27 | 2NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 25 | 2♥ | ♠9 | +1 | -6 |
| -4.1 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 26 | 2♥ | ♦3 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.5 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 27 | 6♠ | ♥10 | +1 | -11 |
| -8.3 | Round 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 24 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -7 |
| -11.8 | Round 3 | ELLEVI | 23 | 5♥ | ♦A | -1 | -14 |