SARNIAK Anna · HAYMAN

1rank
+13.9Butler · 14 bds
+0.99per board
±5.1swing
+1.29vs par /bd
+0.88adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding +1.86 · play -0.57

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.11/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.88/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 80.0% · defence 83.3%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·66.7% (3)
Declarer play0.0% (1)100.0% (4)
Defence100.0% (2)75.0% (4)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT -0.50 (4) · a suit +2.00 (10)

vs par by level: part-score -2.20 (5) · game +1.88 (8) · slam +14.00 (1)

By role: declaring +1.89/bd (+0.38 vs par · 8) · defending -0.20/bd (+2.50 vs par · 6)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.16/bd (-0.29 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +3.14/bd (+2.86 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
QuarterfinalD.KazmuchaK.Mccallum – L.BakerOpen14+13.9+0.99+1.29

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+9.6QuarterfinalBAKER154♠♣4=+7
+8.7QuarterfinalBAKER274♠♦K=+7
+7.1QuarterfinalBAKER196♣♥A-1+14
+6.3QuarterfinalBAKER283NT♦A-2+8
+1.7QuarterfinalBAKER172♠♣Q=+0
+1.0QuarterfinalBAKER202♠♦4-1+1
+0.7QuarterfinalBAKER213NT♥7+2+0
-0.7QuarterfinalBAKER263NT♥7+2+0
-0.9QuarterfinalBAKER221NT♠2+1-10
-1.3QuarterfinalBAKER182♥♣10=+0
-2.0QuarterfinalBAKER164♥♣5+1+0
-3.0QuarterfinalBAKER255♣♦3=-7
-3.7QuarterfinalBAKER242♥x♦Q-3-2
-9.6QuarterfinalBAKER234♠x♦A-1+0