Round 6 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 6 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAUNCZ | FRANCE SENIORS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ESTONIA | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | NEVER CLAIM | NEMESIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | AJ DIAMENT | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | POLAND | MORAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CUNEO | SALAMA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HARRIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | MARILL | TALMAT | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NONAME TUR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | MAROSAMITAWA | BRENO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TESSIERES | YOUNG SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BYE | LATVIA | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 13 | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | NETHERLANDS RED | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | PACIFIC | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | FORMIDABLES | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 6↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R6 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NONAME | 16.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 9 | POLAND | 16.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 11 | MORAN | 15.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 11 | NETHERLANDS RED | 15.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 13 | BRENO | 14.40 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 13 | LATVIA | 14.40 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 13 | MAROSAMITAWA | 14.40 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 16 | DE KNIJFF | 14.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 16 | NEMESIS | 14.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 16 | TALMAT | 14.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 19 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 13.40 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 19 | TESSIERES | 13.40 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 21 | ESTONIA | 13.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 21 | NEVER CLAIM | 13.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 23 | NONAME TUR | 12.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 23 | YOUNG SWEDES | 12.40 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 25 | AJ DIAMENT | 12.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 25 | FRANCE SENIORS | 12.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 25 | LUPO VELOCE | 12.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 25 | PAUNCZ | 12.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 29 | FORMIDABLES | 11.40 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 30 | CUNEO | 11.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 30 | SALAMA | 11.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 32 | BRUNET | 10.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 33 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 10.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 33 | PACIFIC | 10.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 35 | BELL | 8.40 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 36 | HARRIS | 8.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 37 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 6.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 38 | MARILL | 5.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R6 | BAM% |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs FRANCE SENIORS 1 : 3 VP (match 33006) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 3NT | E | ♣10 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs DE KNIJFF 2 : 2 VP (match 33007) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | DE KNIJFF | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs NEMESIS 2 : 2 VP (match 33008) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | NEMESIS | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 33009) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | NONAME | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♥ | E | ♥A | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs MORAN 2 : 2 VP (match 33010) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | MORAN | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦9 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs SALAMA 2 : 2 VP (match 33011) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | SALAMA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♠4 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 33012) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 3NT | E | ♣5 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 3NT | E | ♣10 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs TALMAT 0 : 4 VP (match 33013) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | TALMAT | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs NONAME TUR 0 : 4 VP (match 33070) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NONAME TUR | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♥3 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 4♠ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 4♥ | E | ♠3 | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs BRENO 3 : 1 VP (match 33071) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | BRENO | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♥ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs YOUNG SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 33072) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2♥ | W | ♥7 | +3 | 200 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +3 | 200 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs LATVIA 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33073) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | LATVIA | |
| 11 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | ||||
| 12 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs LUPO VELOCE 4 : 0 VP (match 33074) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 56% | 3NT | W | ♣4 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♣10 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♥ | W | ♦10 | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 33075) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♥6 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 33076) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | BELL | |
| 11 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +2 | 480 | 100% | 4♠ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | ♠4 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | W | ♦10 | +1 | 450 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | W | +2 | 480 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 56% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33077) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | BYE | |
| 11 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | ||||
| 12 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|