Round 20 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TALMAT | NETHERLANDS RED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | PACIFIC | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | MAHAFFEY | FORMIDABLES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | FRANCE SENIORS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | DE KNIJFF | MAROSAMITAWA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NEMESIS | TESSIERES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NONAME | CONNECTOR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | MORAN | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SALAMA | DE BOTTON | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BELL | VINCIGUERRA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | EMERALD | CUNEO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | BYE | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 14 | NONAME TUR | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DRACULA | PAUNCZ | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BRENO | ESTONIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | YOUNG SWEDES | NEVER CLAIM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LATVIA | AJ DIAMENT | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | LUPO VELOCE | POLAND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | FRANCE JUNIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TESSIERES | 52.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 2 | YOUNG SWEDES | 48.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 3 | NETHERLANDS RED | 47.60 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 4 | NONAME TUR | 47.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 5 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 46.80 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 6 | BRENO | 43.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 6 | DRACULA | 43.40 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 6 | FORMIDABLES | 43.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 6 | MAROSAMITAWA | 43.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 6 | NEVER CLAIM | 43.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 6 | PAUNCZ | 43.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 12 | CONNECTOR | 42.40 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 12 | DE KNIJFF | 42.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 12 | LUPO VELOCE | 42.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 12 | MORAN | 42.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 12 | NEMESIS | 42.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 17 | MAHAFFEY | 42.30 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 18 | TALMAT | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 19 | DE BOTTON | 41.60 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 20 | BRUNET | 41.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 20 | EMERALD | 41.40 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 20 | SALAMA | 41.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 23 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 40.80 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 23 | VINCIGUERRA | 40.80 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 25 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 40.60 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 26 | AJ DIAMENT | 40.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 26 | LATVIA | 40.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 26 | POLAND | 40.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 29 | NONAME | 40.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 30 | ESTONIA | 38.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 31 | CUNEO | 37.80 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 32 | FRANCE SENIORS | 37.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 33 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 35.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 34 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 33.80 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 35 | BELL | 33.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 36 | PACIFIC | 31.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 37 | MARILL | 30.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 38 | HARRIS | 20.80 | 2.40 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
TALMAT vs NETHERLANDS RED 2 : 2 VP (match 33265) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TALMAT | NETHERLANDS RED | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 69% | 6NT | W | ♠J | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS BLUE vs PACIFIC 4 : 0 VP (match 33266) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS BLUE | PACIFIC | |
| 7 | 6♥ | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 53% | 4NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 660 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 3NT | E | ♣9 | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | +1 | 660 | 97% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs FORMIDABLES 1 : 3 VP (match 33267) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | FORMIDABLES | |
| 7 | 6♥ | E | ♦Q | = | 1430 | 100% | 6♠ | W | ♣9 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♣8 | +2 | 460 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♣A | +2 | 460 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 2 : 2 VP (match 33268) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♣5 | -3 | 300 | 92% | 4NT | W | ♠J | = | 630 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♣K | +2 | 460 | 92% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | W | = | 630 | 86% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE KNIJFF vs MAROSAMITAWA 4 : 0 VP (match 33269) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE KNIJFF | MAROSAMITAWA | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -3 | 300 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♣5 | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♦x | N | ♥3 | -2 | 300 | 86% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 2♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs TESSIERES 1 : 3 VP (match 33270) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | TESSIERES | |
| 7 | 4NT | E | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 6♠ | W | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs CONNECTOR 0 : 4 VP (match 33271) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | CONNECTOR | |
| 7 | 3NT | E | ♣4 | = | 600 | 73% | 6♥ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MORAN vs BRUNET 2 : 2 VP (match 33272) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MORAN | BRUNET | |
| 7 | 4NT | W | ♠10 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 6♥ | E | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4NT | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SALAMA vs DE BOTTON 2 : 2 VP (match 33273) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SALAMA | DE BOTTON | |
| 7 | 4NT | W | ♦6 | = | 630 | 86% | 6NT | W | ♠J | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♣K | = | 420 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♣A | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4NT | W | = | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | -3 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33274) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BYE | |
| 7 | Pass | — | 0 | 65% | Pass | — | 0 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 8 | Pass | — | 0 | 96% | Pass | — | 0 | 96% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | 0 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 65% | ||||||
| 8 | Pass | 0 | 96% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 96% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs VINCIGUERRA 0 : 4 VP (match 33345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | VINCIGUERRA | |
| 7 | 4NT | W | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 53% | 6♠ | W | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 3♥ | W | ♣A | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4NT | W | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | +2 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EMERALD vs CUNEO 0 : 4 VP (match 33346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EMERALD | CUNEO | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♠J | +1 | 630 | 86% | 6♥ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2♦x | N | ♥3 | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs HARRIS 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | HARRIS | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 65% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 96% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 96% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 65% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 96% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME TUR vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 33348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME TUR | MARILL | |
| 7 | 6♥ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 53% | 6NT | E | ♣5 | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♣8 | +1 | 430 | 68% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRACULA vs PAUNCZ 0 : 4 VP (match 33349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRACULA | PAUNCZ | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 620 | 77% | 6NT | E | ♣2 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 68% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs ESTONIA 1 : 3 VP (match 33350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | ESTONIA | |
| 7 | 3NT | E | ♠J | +1 | 630 | 86% | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YOUNG SWEDES vs NEVER CLAIM 0 : 4 VP (match 33351) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YOUNG SWEDES | NEVER CLAIM | |
| 7 | 4NT | W | ♠J | = | 630 | 86% | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♣A | +2 | 460 | 92% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4NT | W | = | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs AJ DIAMENT 3 : 1 VP (match 33352) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -3 | 300 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♠J | +1 | 630 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♣6 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 86% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs POLAND 4 : 0 VP (match 33353) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | POLAND | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♦Q | -3 | 300 | 92% | 4♥ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 3NT | W | ♣A | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 95% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs FRANCE JUNIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 33354) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | FRANCE JUNIORS | |
| 7 | 6NT | E | ♥6 | -2 | 200 | 69% | 4NT | E | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|