Round 2 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND | FRANCE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CUNEO | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HARRIS | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MARILL | NONAME | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PAUNCZ | MORAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ESTONIA | SALAMA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NEVER CLAIM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | AJ DIAMENT | TALMAT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | BRUNET | NONAME TUR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | NETHERLANDS RED | BRENO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | PACIFIC | YOUNG SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | FORMIDABLES | LATVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MAROSAMITAWA | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | TESSIERES | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BYE | BYE | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NEVER CLAIM | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 9 | NONAME | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 9 | POLAND | 7.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 12 | DE KNIJFF | 6.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 12 | LUPO VELOCE | 6.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 12 | NEMESIS | 6.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 15 | AJ DIAMENT | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 15 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 15 | BRENO | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 15 | MORAN | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 15 | TESSIERES | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 20 | BELL | 4.40 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 21 | FRANCE SENIORS | 4.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 21 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 21 | LATVIA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 21 | NETHERLANDS RED | 4.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 21 | NONAME TUR | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 21 | YOUNG SWEDES | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 27 | BRUNET | 3.40 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 28 | CUNEO | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 28 | ESTONIA | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 28 | FORMIDABLES | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 28 | PACIFIC | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 28 | PAUNCZ | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 28 | SALAMA | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 34 | MAROSAMITAWA | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 34 | TALMAT | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 36 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 36 | HARRIS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 36 | MARILL | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
POLAND vs FRANCE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 32974) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 3 | 3♣ | N | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 87% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs DE KNIJFF 2 : 2 VP (match 32975) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | DE KNIJFF | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 620 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♥ | E | ♠K | = | 110 | 95% | 1NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 32976) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | NEMESIS | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2NT | W | ♣3 | +1 | 150 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♣10 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 87% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs NONAME 0 : 4 VP (match 32977) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | NONAME | |
| 3 | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 620 | 76% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 1NT | N | ♥2 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs MORAN 2 : 2 VP (match 32978) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | MORAN | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦A | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♦A | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥4 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♥5 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs SALAMA 2 : 2 VP (match 32979) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | SALAMA | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♣3 | = | 600 | 52% | 2♠ | W | ♣2 | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♦ | W | ♠K | -3 | 300 | 97% | 1NT | S | ♥3 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 4 | 2♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 32980) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 3 | 3♣ | N | ♦6 | -3 | 150 | 87% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♥x | W | ♥10 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 2♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs TALMAT 2 : 2 VP (match 32981) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | TALMAT | |
| 3 | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 620 | 76% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2♥ | W | ♥10 | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs NONAME TUR 1 : 3 VP (match 33038) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | NONAME TUR | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 1NT | S | ♠3 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs BRENO 1 : 3 VP (match 33039) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | BRENO | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦A | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥4 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs YOUNG SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 33040) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 3NT | N | ♥2 | -4 | 200 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥4 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -4 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs LATVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 33041) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | LATVIA | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♥K | = | 600 | 52% | 2♠ | W | ♦3 | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♥x | E | ♠K | = | 670 | 100% | 3NT | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 4 | 2♥x | E | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 33042) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 3 | 4♠ | E | ♦K | = | 620 | 76% | 3NT | E | ♠J | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 1NT | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1NT | S | ♥5 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 33043) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 3 | 3NT | E | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♣3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 1NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2♦ | W | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 4 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 33044) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | BELL | |
| 3 | 4♠ | W | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 100% | 3NT | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | S | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2NTx | S | ♥6 | = | 690 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2NTx | S | = | 690 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BYE 0 : 0 VP (match 33045) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BYE | |
| 3 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 76% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 95% | ||||
| 4 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|